• seang96@spgrn.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I want solar but I don’t want it on my newish roof with a 50 year waranty. I get why roof installs are popular but why does it seem to be the only solution for consumers that is offered. They can look at my house from maps and see of got a sizable empty plot of land next to my house that could also be used.

    • Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And not to mention how expensive it is to get a new roof installed with solar panels on it. They charge a lot of money to remove and put back the panels.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It should be illegal to not architect a home to maximize solar.

        California has a terrible law that promotes “builder grade” solar of the minimum regulatory size, and then makes adding proper solar more expensive than if they didn’t fuck up the house intentionally.

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Eh I got the land for it why couldn’t I use it? Solar on the roof means you have to go on the roof to fix or troubleshoot. You are adding holes to your roof, unless if you get the tesla solar roof in the first place which you can’t trust anything made by them so you are better off keeping them separate.

        The only pro I have seen with it being on the roof, which is probably a good one if true, since it is attached to your house, your home insurance would have to cover damages from bad storms / freaks of nature.

        Edit: Also beyond the obvious not needing additional land for it.