Andromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoSouth Afrulecabeehaw.orgexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down10cross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
arrow-up1232arrow-down1external-linkSouth Afrulecabeehaw.orgAndromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: science_memes@mander.xyz
minus-squareCatt@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-22 months agoNope, the text is correct. not (x or y) <=> (not x) and (not y) not (x and y) <=> (not x) or (not y) Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
minus-squareScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoAh yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense
Nope, the text is correct.
Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
Ah yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense