cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/24920069

“These are not ‘drug dens,’ they are health centres,” said Philpott, now the dean of health sciences at Queen’s University, in a post on X.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    11·
    2 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    Supervised consumption sites are “drug dens” that a future Conservative government would not fund and seek to close, party leader Pierre Poilievre said Friday.

    They also provide access to clean supplies to reduce rates of HIV and other diseases, as well as offer referrals to users seeking treatment options.

    He suggested the federal government has the power to close existing sites under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, under which it grants them an exemption to operate.

    However, he did sit as a member of the Conservative government of Stephen Harper, which passed the Respect for Communities Act in the years following the Supreme Court’s decision.

    The controversial law required prospective supervised consumption sites to meet 26 criteria in order to open, such as tracking crime rates and providing medical evidence, along with handing in letters from provincial health ministers, local police and other stakeholders.

    In fact, the staff have attended to about 50,000 overdoses [and] medical emergencies since 2017, with no reported fatalities on site," she wrote, adding thousands are alive because of access to such facilities.

    The original article contains 655 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!