return2ozma@lemmy.world to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 months agoDoesn't matter how you try to justify it...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down10cross-posted to: housing_bubble_2@lemmy.world
arrow-up17arrow-down1imageDoesn't matter how you try to justify it...lemmy.worldreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: housing_bubble_2@lemmy.world
minus-squaremasquenox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months ago They’re providing/enabling the human right. You are literally saying that your human rights should be privately owned by somebody else. If that’s the case, why even bother with human rights?
minus-squareKissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-23 months agoYou gotta separate the concept of a right from fulfilling them. You can have a human right. But that alone does not answer how it is fulfilled. The right is not owned. It can’t be.
You are literally saying that your human rights should be privately owned by somebody else. If that’s the case, why even bother with human rights?
You gotta separate the concept of a right from fulfilling them.
You can have a human right. But that alone does not answer how it is fulfilled.
The right is not owned. It can’t be.