I have problems with people who abstained. The hard thing is, how do you change voter behavior?

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It’s a fundemental aspect of the medium, though. A bit of a stretch to call people cowards for interacting in the way the platform was designed around.

      • ZorroTheFox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Reading comprehension is not your strong suit i take it….

        Solely ‘downvoting’ with no expressed reasoning besides presumably being butthurt and as one person said ‘because it’s presented wrong’ is coward like. It was designed around comments, the vote system is one aspect and the least important one that, i don’t think you know what ‘fundamental’ means.

          • ZorroTheFox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Sensitive? It was a passing remark used to segway into the actual point lol however, you can’t seem to get over it

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I confess, I shouldn’t have used the less common meaning. “[…] why are you so aware of it?” would have been a more accessible phrasing. Why is it important to you?

              • ZorroTheFox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                That doesn’t change anything… but since my comments going to be arbitrarily removed then this i pointless anyway. Besides that you’re just going to keep being indirect just to waste time and dissolve the thread. Its not more important than the content, but it’s a good metric for gauging the audience

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  (I can’t speak to the actions of the moderators, alas.)

                  Indirect discussion is usually the best way to approach a complex topic. Or a language in general, really. It’s the foundation of… well, rhetoric. It’s been a fascinating topic of discussion for (at least) 2000 years, if you’re at all interested in engaging with it.

                  Downvotes are a modern implementation of a truly ancient concept here. It’s a pretty critical aspect of the comment system, or participatory discussion in general.

                  Then follow me and give me audience, friends.
                  Cassius, go you into the other street
                  And part the numbers.

                  I mean sure, he’s not referring to the number of upvotes and downvotes, but if any human being in history understood the role of the audience surely it was Shakespeare. “The audience can’t exist without the subject, but neither can the subject have import without the audience” and all that. It really is a fundamental aspect of human interaction, not just internet forums.

                  • ZorroTheFox@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 hours ago

                    You should know i literally said “this dudes about to pull up a shakespear filibuster” and sure enough

                    Im honestly glad i never went to college