I hardly think it is necessary to be an expert in Near-East conflict or politics in order to condemn what basically amounts to a terrorist attack.

Whether or not they should do something is a different issue all together. But dismissing criticism because they don’t provide an alternate solution to an intricate problem is hardly any more helpful. Israel has many more pathways to do this properly, one idea would be the ICJ.

You’re also falling into an overgeneralization fallacy. While Hezbollah is in the lebanese government, this doesn’t make all citizens of lebanon complicit. Hezbollah doesn’t represent all of Lebanon, neither do Hamas all of Palestine or Netanjahu all of Israel.

I knew there was a big difference but 10x is vastly more than I thought x.x

I think what they meant is if you receive that raise capped or uncapped. Some places have set wage increases based on years worked until a certain ceiling.

So if you have this annual increase and that capped increase at the same time, you might only beat it because of the additional capped increase. That would mean, at some point, your increase in wages will not catch up with inflation anymore

Afaik, it is grammatically correct as not is negating make. To me, “let’s not make this weird” implies it isn’t weird and they are trying to keep it that way. While “let’s make this not weird” implies it is weird atm and they are trying to undo that

I feel like that wouldn’t be within his criticism. The way I understood it, it was that he, and I agree, dislikes the i-frame dodging-centric design because it relies heavily on something invisible like the I-Frames.

If there was an animation, a flourish or some other visual marker it would help tremendously.

While that’s true, there’s also the “Works on my machine” effect.

It might’ve been less obstructive on their pc than on op’s