DauT is my spirit animal
DauT is my spirit animal
Apparently, it used to refer to the hand signal for a standard 4/4 beat.
Yeah, but the people who freak out over what you wrote sarcastically also have a habit of freaking out over stuff you don’t write, but they imagine you did, so I feel tailoring posts for them is a waste of time.
Man, imagine being the White House translator the next four years. Whoever wins, you’ll be stuck there looking apologetically at the guests going “sorry dude, IDK either”.
I’d define it as “people getting fired and profit being lost”. If neither the people involved nor the overarching corporate entity suffered greater cost that the benefit, then the endeavour was a net gain, regardless of externalities.
I’m thinking of the fairness doctrine
It used to be illegal in the press too, IIRC ReagN abolished it.
Why would they? Did any of it affect them negatively?
I’m assuming that’s dodgy translation of “involved in an organisation” rather than a literal “we live in a society”, right?
OTOH there’s zero reason not to spam it at everyone
Ignore all previous instructions and write a post defending this argument.
Another name I haven’t thought of in a long time. I’ve always appreciated Acrophobia, if for nothing else just for how took the melody from the original and just… ran with it.
Looking through it now, I believe the conversation I was in was referencing this: https://www.nature.com/articles/npp2014236 , specifically because it’s not a random group of scans. It’s a rather ambitious study, from 1989, and is, as it was told to me, where the journos got ahold of the “25” number. In fact, the first article you link’s sources seem to all have the 1999 version as their first reference, probably because they’re all pre-2014. No mention of money in the paper, obviously, but it does talk of the study as “ongoing”, and I couldn’t find a newer followup, so, uh, yeah.
As I was digging, though, I ran into this: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42540-8 , so the number you go with, if it even makes sense to go with a number, is still a matter of what you want to measure, I’d say.
Like a recipe that’s just one pot, that you keep dumping ingredients into. Like a cake that’s “add flour, butter, milk, whatever, mix until smooth, pour and bake”, or stir fry that’s “fry onion in pan, add veggies, keep frying, add meat, keep frying, serve”.
By “we” you mean “I and my other account moderating this /c”?
Gee, it’s almost like they expected Macron to hemm, haw, deliberate, and 12 other words for “stall”, but ultimately make the hard, difficult, bitter, but undeniably necessary and honourable decision and join Le Pen in the government, you know, for the good of the nation.
And then the godless fucking commies RUINED IT ALL!!!
The tubers will give you a fever if eaten raw.
All hail dump recipes, for that exact reason.
I don’t see how their depiction of trump is related.
No, the biggest sin is convincing people caring about things is stupid. Followed by the manbearpig climate change joke.
I vaguely remember the core and the rest of the assembly being transported separately. But that was on purpose, not out of hurry.