I know that. That still misses the point. The point of the law is to clarify that on digital storefronts that you make purchases for licensed digital goods, that you can’t imply to the consumer that they actually own those goods. It doesn’t matter if there is an offline installer. It doesn’t matter if you can ‘keep your installers forever’.
The ‘Tells it like it is and doesn’t care what anyone thinks’ candidate.
I guess they can chalk this up to having a concept of an opinion at the moment in addition to having a concept of a plan.