you’re assuming intents and that is MEAN

well they just said they are thinking about it, those things takes time, let things start to roll

i don’t know for britain but in france you can’t “de-arrest” someone legally, only the prosecutor can, so he doesn’t even know what his own bullshit mean

that… doesn’t sound like a friend. I’m sorry for you

So a lot of people will explain it with many very interesting psychological and sociological theories on discrimination and shits But to summarize it all :

they are really fucking dumb

They can’t understand two thirds of the shits happening so when faced with something new they simplify it by interpreting it as close to the closest thing they understand. Except they are fucking dumb so the closest thing they understand is miles away from the thing they are discovering. Therefore when they encounter autism, they understand it like the closest thing they actually know, which is children or more likely stupid and they talk to children like they are dumb.

Now the other things that lead them to that is that despite being world class idiot their job is to evaluate people so considering they don’t understand most things they require even more simplification.

TL;DR : tell them you know damn well they’re not supposed to require an eval for autist so you’re gonna sue them, should shut them the fuck up

art source : https://www.artstation.com/artwork/gJ82Yx

Why does a lot of anglo-saxon forces seems to not know what it means to investigate terrorism. Like they have the same problem with their FBI in Burgerland

this site is weird, I don’t get turbo depression when I go here

not what antinatalist says

Going about that by forced sterilization, coercion, abuse, or eugenics would be bad for obvious reasons

Yeah an Mein Kampf is a book. The thing is that if antinatalism would genuinely improve the world it means it does have the goal to be implemented in all of society. This mean you’re gonna need to set a standard through rules and to enforce them. Those are the means.

Oh and if Antinatalism think having children is already bad, it clearly present having disabled children as worse

people who suffer their life have a need to express it. People who are fine don’t. Simple survivor bias

I would hate to have a child knowing they would likely have to face racial discrimination

Yep easier to die than dealing with the problem and, you know trying to do something. You know thank god everyone before us choose that instead of striving for social progress, that’s precisely why society has been steadily progressing towards amelioration for at the VERY least the past 500 years.

I do not find it moral to have a child because they may be gay, or autistic, or gender nonconforming, or poor

So… that, my friend, is turbo-eugenics. Yes, because you finding it immoral to have kids because they could be those things means that, if you had a mean to have kids, without those risks it would at least be less immoral. Oh and before you start to find excuse : making every argument for something and just saying at the end that it is bad is not being against something.

Could also have the other side of the problem. Some people can expect a diagnosis to completely solve everything in their lives. People may have unrealistic expectation towards their diagnosis. In that case it could also help the doctor calm down those expectation before giving the diagnosis in order to not hurt them too much.