Ok, so carried to it’s logical conclusion, he’s suggesting that sucking dick is unmanly.
So there’s definitely nothing manly about this chap then: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Radcliffe
Ok, so carried to it’s logical conclusion, he’s suggesting that sucking dick is unmanly.
So there’s definitely nothing manly about this chap then: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Radcliffe
Valve cover off, small rock in valve cover, valve cover back on.
Just crunched some numbers. This dude is worth 2.3 billion. If he spent HALF of his money on $100 haircuts, he could afford 11.5 million haircuts.
The outrage is definately the point. All the way up there ladder.
The little guys get to exert their will on their fellow man, the bigger the reaction, the bigger the sense of power. It’s an issue of self esteem.
Meanwhile, the man depicted gets forcibly implanted into your consciousness. You’re forced to pay attention to them. Much like a childs tantrum or someone standing in front of the TV.
Ah, interesting. That sounds pretty negligible, feature wise. Might be fun on a racing game or something I suppose.
I recommend going to a pawn shop. They likely have a variety of late model controllers. You can then hold them and see which speaks to you. I bought a ps5 controller from a pawn shop for like $50 over a year ago and I’ve loved it. I use it over Bluetooth with steam and I get rumble and all that.
I use a ps5 controller on pc and get rumble? Even the weirdo trackpad in the middle works like a cursor.
Two words: mother issues. It’s a self perpetuating problem. Conservatives belittle their women, their women take it out on their kids. Their kids grow up warped. Their warped kids belittle women.
Washington D.C.
No, I’m dead serious. I believe an exposed pie would survive on the ground long enough for a whole bush to grow around it and then subsequently be eaten by a dog. I am in no way being humorous.
Maybe the pie was there first and the bush grew around it.
I mean, we’re a lot of things, we’re not weird.
I would like to hear more about these other things. Rapists (Bergdorff Goodmans)? Pedophiles (Epstein)? Racists (1973)? Fascists (“day one”)? Seems like “weird” might be the least of their issues.
Kamala is gonna absolutely destroy you in the debate.
The good news is: probably; the bad news is: she has to be absolutely perfect.
Nobody gives a shit what Trump says. It’s 99% saw dust. He can say or do almost anything, and it won’t even stand out against the backdrop of 50+ years of well publicized questionable behaviour. Then the people who benefit from his relevancy just hone in on the clips and bits that closest approach coherency. Trump isn’t even a man, so much as he is a concept. He could just stand there mutely making faces and his base would hunker down and figure out a way to conform it to their rudimentary sketch of reality. Where as everyone is going to be going through Harris’ every word with a fine tooth comb.
Even if she evicerates him, cites facts, speaks eloquently, it’s just going to be conspiracy fodder to the mob. They’re a mob. All they do is yell and burn down what they don’t understand (which is plentiful).
I’m excited to see it. But I would council against underestimating hateful people.
I went to Folsom Street Fair many moons ago, and had the epiphany “I am absolutely not man enough to fuck these dudes.” I don’t know how the stereo type of manly men only fucking women is supportable. It’s like saying “real men drink french vanilla iced coffee slushies”, meanwhile the “weak” men are drinking straight up espresso.
Sure why not, and lets kill a couple goats and shit for good measure too while we’re at it.