Roughly equal parts liberal propaganda. I like to go exploring.
Roughly equal parts liberal propaganda. I like to go exploring.
You don’t think that maybe this was a figure of speech? Like saying, “life slaps you in the face”.
psst
Hey, kid, don’t tell anyone I told you about this
*Lifts coat
iodine
https://code.kryo.se/iodine
Description: tool for tunneling IPv4 data through a DNS server
This is a piece of software that lets you tunnel IPv4 data through a DNS
server. This can be usable in different situations where internet access is
firewalled, but DNS queries are allowed.
Nobody has really answered the last part of my question. I’m not asking whether or not this is ethical, I’m asking how can I keep the employees who don’t leave in a state of perception where they think I’m ready to fire and replace them at any moment. I don’t want them to realize their position and leverage it against me.
I’ve been thinking about holding the promise of upping wage by a dollar and to keep pushing out the date as means of helping them realize how easy their work is. I’m not going to allow non-committed hires to devour the value of my business over what amounts to easy work. They know it’s easy work.
I don’t appreciate the sarcasm. Things have become tight. And after some knuckleheads couldn’t handle basic tasks in a basic industry, I have found we are able to operate with just half of the staff I used to pay. The ones who stick around know their worth.
What I’m worried about is that the remainder will also try an leave, knowing that I rely on them more than ever before. So my angle is to obfuscate the fact that I actually need them. How do I make sure they can’t read me on that?
the only “good” thing is the convenience
How many party favors and discount happy meal toys do you purchase?
bragging about how awesome it was that the federal government was providing extra money and it was like working a good job…
Revolt hush money. I’m sure this was ran through a simulation at some prior time, “how can we pacify a domestic population that might reject what we’re about to do to them?” Money, of course.
For anything new that enters my life, I want 100% for it to not be anything at all to do with digital technology.
And if it absolutely must be digital technology it non-negotiably must be:
Anything mobile is a total lost cause. I have ZERO interest in “smart” phones. Fuck that noise.
“Perfection is only achieved when there is nothing left to take away.”
I have done okay at keeping unnecessary crapware from creeping into my life, but there is the occasional second hand smoke from the masses who will bend over for literally anything.
Sports should be segmented out by testosterone levels.
They must not have been active at all within the circles of freedom and privacy advocacy. It was a self-inflicted death.
Problem #00001: Relying on googlevideo in order to obtain information on how to avoid Google.
And also the second hand smoke phenomenon: When you use big tech, you softly compel those around you to also use big tech. The more people that give in and acquiesce, the harder it becomes for the hold outs to continue to resist.
Republicans: “Everybody watch out! There is a Democrat plot to steal the next election!”
Democrats: “Everybody watch out! There is a Republican plot to steal the next election!”
Do you people fucking hear yourselves?
This feels like watching pro wrestling
I’ll be the guy that says it: Lemmy already leans pretty hard in normie demographics. It is a trait inherited from Reddit, as many lemmy users are former redditors.
I’d always been amused at the fact that boomer school librarians were primarily the ones responsible for “teaching” students how to “use computers”. It really hammered home the point early on for me that you learn primarily by doing, not by being instructed.
How was the concept first explained to you, or when did it click?
I was too young to have it explained. I was just given access to computers since as far back as I can remember. And internet-connected computers almost just as far.
Do you understand how insane it is to have the aggregate of all human knowledge
I disagree with the notion that all human knowledge is reachable through the internet. I didn’t used to have this perspective until only a few years ago.
Were your parents super strict about internet usage?
I had absolutely no supervision, aside from concern over time spent playing games (which I think they perceived differently from non-game activity, which can be equally as unproductive).
How quickly did you find workarounds?
Usurped de facto control over the family router as a by product of being the only one both willing and able to “help” “administrate” it. It remained that way until the day I moved out.
I think that millennials got to enjoy a once-in-human history opportunity of digital literacy asymmetry between immediately adjacent generations. We had unprecedented freedom.
leading to significant manipulation of public discourse
Pretending that this wasn’t already a massive issue on places like reddit since years ago, with or without bots, is a little bit disingenuous.
WEF digital IDs by another name
wiby.me to help explore non-corporate web