When a business blames its customers for choosing to no longer be its customers, it’s a sure sign the business is declining. Depending on the severity, it’s often a sign the business is failing.
This applies here, as well as any time you see an article that millennials are killing <business/industry/etc>. It also applies when an entertainer blames their (potential) audience for not enjoying their work. See Jerry Seinfeld, Kid Rock, etc.
No one owes your business any patronage.
This isn’t true, at least in the US. The vast majority of dog food is safe for human consumption, albeit not recommended.
Just FYI, 538 today is not the same as it was when they became noteworthy. Nate Silver left the company (and its parent, Disney). He also took his models with him, since those were merely licensed (unlike the name/company).
The new 538 is being run by a guy with very questionable models.
It’s really difficult to prove who did what with Epstein. Between his secrecy and the cover stories, some really did have no idea what he was involved in.
There are others with much stronger evidence, but it’s still probably not enough to get a conviction at trial. For instance, Limited Brands founder Les Wexner. Look up the evidence against him. If you can’t even convict him, how likely do you think we are to get much on Trump?
There are a number of them being floated right now. If Biden had dropped out a year ago, they would’ve had a traditional competition in the primary. Then we would’ve all gotten complacent and assumed we had it made, and we’d end up in 2016 again.
But to directly answer your question, the names I see being floated the most are CA gov Newsom, MI gov Whitmer, KY gov Beshear, and PA gov Shapiro. And yes, switching to any of them would be difficult and risky.
The surprise shouldn’t be that you’re about to propose. The surprise should be in how you choose to propose.
Unless the ring’s details are part of the surprise (which they could be, if it’s meaningful to the couple), clear and open communication should be preferred
A much better question is why does the government (by way of its appointed monitor) think they have a say on the matter? IANAL, but this seems like a pretty clear violation of the first amendment right to free speech. This is especially true as a result of Citizens United, as bad as the ruling was.
That’s nothing new. It’s always a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwich, and has been for a long time
Vegetarian can be cheaper, but isn’t a guarantee. If you are eating processed foods like single serving meals, the vegetarian options are often more expensive for the same quality.
Cooking yourself, from scratch, would save a lot more money. Plus it actually is cheaper to use veggies.
Looking forward to seeing this on Technology Connections. Seems right up his alley.
But knowing his timeframe of products, it’ll probably be 20 years from now…
They are allowed to run, because there’s no law stopping them.
As for why they have a chance at winning, I don’t think I can answer that without significant bias.
Just for additional context, this is not a recent development. It was designed in 2010, with a model exhibited in 2011.
The main problem with this is that there’s literally zero way to prove this, one way or the other. There are no logs with that level of detail, nor is there a (usable) timestamp of the observed infraction.
The best you could do is show that you did not send a text message, or a Facebook post, etc. Not only does this fail any chain of custody concerns (since you can’t get a certified copy from an independent party), it’s also trying to (impossibly) prove a negative.
Even if you could, that’s still not good enough. You have to show, conclusively, that you were doing something explicitly allowed.
Go ahead and try to show that you even skipped a song in your preferred music player, let alone when.
It wasn’t that long ago that Ohio was a clear swing state. While Republicans have always had an edge, it was not uncommon to see various offices/etc flip blue. While this alone won’t bring those days back, it’s also not an impossible task.
Then why do you need to tolerate it better?
There’s something missing in this ask. If you don’t handle a food very well, you simply avoid/reduce it. Whether it’s caffeine, an allergy, or whatever.
Why do you need to change your body’s reaction? Why not just switch to decaf or other drinks?
It does if you have career progression and promotions in mind. Also if you’re looking for some new insights to shake things up.
He should sic them on SCOTUS instead
Yes, and they’ve also started it with Harris.
Good news (everyone)!
He was later retconned into having a long, happy life with alternate Frye.
And yet, somehow, he’s still more fit for office than Trump.