I think you are looking at this from a total energy lense, rather than an electricity lens.

If we look at this strictly from electrical power generation: we currently have 14.6 TWH nuclear, 5.7 TWH Coal, and 11.8 TWH gas, oil, and others (2020, NR Can). So triple nuclear would be 43.8 TWH, more than enough to absorb both fossil fuel blocks (17.5 combined).

I’m not a fan of straight proportional representation, because it undercuts and devalues ridings and constituencies.

I’m not going to pretend to know the real solution though.

Minority government led by the ONDP is my best case Ontario.

you would fail to pass your test on if you were driving under the limit for no reason.

So you need to break the law to pass your driving test? Carbrainism is wild.

I fully accept your built environment argument, and everything else you are saying. But this? “It’s actually a struggle. climbing it at 20mph, and I even get foot pain trying to keep the accelerator at just the right depression to stay at 20mph.” Means you are physically unfit to drive. It’s also a maximum, you’re allowed to go below 20 mph.

For people yes.

For vehicles no. But vehicles don’t take damage

A self-paced study program with testing at the end should be satisficing and economical.

For comparison, here’s the requirements for pilots. I’d say aviation has got it pretty dialed in by now.

https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation/licensing-pilots-personnel/staying-current-proficient-pilot

“plan your arrival time, not departure time”

My arrival time is the time I have to be at work without getting fired.

The Ontario Highway Traffic Act, for example, gets about 6 updates per year.

Online Written test every year, in person written test every 2 years (the laws do change after all).

Road test every 4-5 years.

Bingo on the violations. In person written test for any infraction, road test for any infraction involving points.

Not white people in photo.

Photo is of people white people brought here for indentured labour

;)

Anyways, my greater point is that we’ve been an immigrant nation for a good while now. Little rude to pull the ladder behind us.

The deliciousness of the descendants of white colonizers complaining about new people settling on “their” land.

Since the province is “science basing” this. Do we have any data that supports the lanes are actually the throughput limiter? It’s almost always the intersections.

Can the province provide any data that adding a lane will improve motor vehicle traffic flow? Can the province provide any data that the car throughput increase will be more than the bicycle throughput that is lost?

Ref : Ontario

Strategically, I think the Liberals should be waiting until as close as possible to the election call. It stops the conservatives having time to pivot to a campaign strategy that isn’t “Trudeau Bad”

Having just gone through the LaSalle Causeway “repair” drama; it might be easier to just demolish and replace the bridge. But I’m not sure how historically significant this one is.

I would like that. Works well in Québec.

Neat. I feel like it removes some of the magic from decorating houses, but having never seen one it’s an unvalidated guess.

Not sure how the accessibility is any different, but my neighborhood tends to be a drop in location for most the city, so we’re just kind of expected to met kids where they’re at. Maybe we’re just used to it?

What is a trunk-or-treat?

Fair enough, my Canadian bias snuck in there.