![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/44bf11eb-4336-40eb-9778-e96fc5223124.png)
I find it annoying when people talk like this. It sounds like you forced the other person to be with you, or that you consider yourself so important that the other person would sacrifice their comfort for you.
I find it annoying when people talk like this. It sounds like you forced the other person to be with you, or that you consider yourself so important that the other person would sacrifice their comfort for you.
This. The bot is effectively just propaganda for the author’s biases.
My ex said sometimes he got lower abdominal pain after cumming. Is that a thing for men? He said he’d get the shits if it was too bad lol.
Yes. There’s also been a spike of political commentors that seem normal until you engage with them, then they fire back with emotionally-charged nonsense full of contradictions.
Trolls and bots seem to have found a new word. “Reactionary”. I wonder who’s paying them to use it.
He’s just trying to sound smart. Lol
I thought Elon had suddenly turned in favor of Kamala. XD
Being a nerd. It’s in the picture.
Only insecticide
What job proposal? This is a platform or a scam, any way you look at it is in no way different from what already exists, just with 0 protection for the workers, and using monopoly money that might make your work worth 20% less every month.
So you don’t, is what you’re saying.
Lol. Cope.
Pretty trash points ngl. Written from privilege imo.
Makes video about the importance of pronouns. Refuses to read names or pronouns of the people that interact on the platform where they posted said video.
Hmmm…
You have to listen to garbage to find the gems.
Really? They look like just stupid mean teenagers to me.
You never know bro.
How is simping them any different from calling them “basically Hitler from the past”? If you’re talking with your feelings, what you are saying is by definition not-objective, like with simps, but also with haters. I doubt you or OP are any more informed on history than the average Lemmy rando. By starting with the desired conclusion, rather than with arguments, the discussion is already beginning on subjective terms.
Hm… At some point a human will have to say “Yes, this response is correct.” to whatever the machine outputs. The output then takes the bias of that human. (This is unavoidable, I’m just pointing it out.) If this is really not an effort in ideological propaganda, a solution could be for the bot to provide arguments, rather han conclusions. Instead of telling me a source is “Left” or “Biased”, it could say: “I found this commentary/article/websites/video discussing this aource’s political leaning (or quality): Link 1 Link 2 Link 3”
Here you reduce bias by presenting information, instead of conclusions, and then letting the reader come to their own conclusions based on this information. This not only is better at education, but also helps readers develop their critical thinking.
Instead of… You know, being told what to think about what by a bot.