![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lebowski.social/pictrs/image/2c4dd923-c615-4b1c-b52b-f3ef2215930f.png)
The dumbasses here really bring the room together.
The dumbasses here really bring the room together.
Criminal or civil liability?
I eventually worked it out, but the point was to help others.
The plot is surprisingly complex for what is cast as a “kids show” or “Trek for newbs”. Don’t watch it unless you have seen at least some of the Voyager series. The plot from S1 ties right into S2. I had a moment in S2E6 (or thereabouts) where my emotions got trigger when Janeway makes a tough choice.
The show works.
Halfway through and I’m enjoying it immensely. I’m in my middle age years so don’t tell me this show is for kids. Trek fans shouldn’t miss this series.
No they want the NYT to demonstrate that it actually wrote the articles.
For the noobs, you should explain what this actually is. All I have is a name and a date. No deets.
He obstructed justice when he didn’t return them as well.
Maybe lower the prices at her theme parks, then?
We made it over a century and a half, but only barely. I don’t think these words were meant to hold up in today’s society. How is it possible that you can quote somebody from TJ’s time and say that it is at all like our time? Let’s face it, he was just a prognosticating bullshitter. To look back at a quote like this to justify the actions of the present is a horrific and insensitive thing to do.
Well that’s just dumb. What about the rest of us?
Ya as a parent that would be your choice to make, but there really shouldn’t be anything wrong with nudity at any age.
Toddlers don’t sexualize everything like adults do, so there is nothing to explain, really.
Thanks and yes, I see Squid there plenty.
You got trombone Riker on speed dial
The article states nothing of that though.
Two diametrically opposed things, you mean. And yes, they can.
And cardio plays no part?
Didn’t Data duplicate with Tasha Yar ?
I don’t think his criminal liability is any different between him being a producer or an actor. He was criminally charged for manslaughter because he was the one who pointed the gun and pulled the trigger. It had nothing to do with his title or role in the movie’s production.
Civil liability is an entirely different thing. I would argue his civil liability as the producer is probably greater than it is as the actor. An actor would in theory have very little to do with the overall production and the handling of firearms on the set. The producer on the other hand could easily be proven as responsible for systemic failures in basic safety protocols.