Water (and other liquids) make solid things wet.

If you put water and oil in a container and they separate, the interface between them is not wet.

Humid air can make things wet, but that only happens when the moisture in the air condenses onto a solid surface. Humid air will not make the surface of a lake wet even though water is condensing out of the air onto that surface.

I know, I mean when you are too evil for even Nestle and really any oil company. You need to take a serious look in the mirror.

I feel there is a “No it’s them that are wrong” meme in here somewhere.

You mean like walking down the street or driving to the supermarket for gaming snacks?

Seems google is trying to keep file sync on android for only themselves.

Syncthing no longer developing for Android.

No resolution from back and forth with Google, play store policies and lack of developers.

Not too difficult.

TestYourIQ.org doesn’t seem to exist, me thinks this is bullshit

When your party is the source of a lot of cunty behavior; eventually someone will call you on your bullshit.

I moved mine over about 2 years ago.

Only issue was getting the printer to work… Took a few hours.

• Gina Davis.
• Al Pacino.
• Brad Pitt.
• Edward Norton.
• Helen Mirren.
• Judy Dench.

There’s are a few others. That don’t come to mind right now.

There is also the point that if police get called to a disturbance at an address, they will know if there are likely to be guns in the house.

In time, has such a awesome premise.

But what we got was a “poor little rich girl” story.

Not really, i first used Linux in 2001 or 3… It’s been some time. I think it was fedora 1. I was 21/3.

First installed Linux in 2008, Ubuntu 8.04 and started daily driving Ubuntu 10.04 in late 2010.

Since then I’ve used a lot of different distros, I’m now running mint.

In saying that, my son has only had Linux (and Chromebooks at school), I got him to help install his own system, he was 7 at the time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZeWPScnolo

Maybe update the Wiki, you seem to know a lot about the condition.

The language used is very mild.

Wikipedia didn’t have that detail…sounds a lot worse now.

Harlequin syndrome is not debilitating, so treatment is not normally necessary.

I looked it up, doesn’t seem that bad.

• Str 10
• Dex 12
• Con 8-9
• Int 20-24
• Wiz 18-22
• Cha 9-10

Hard to tell, but with 30 as world class, I think a lot of people are underestimating what they are capable of.

As for what I would focus new points into; I should take the +1dex class someone suggested, stretching and yoga are good for you; Cha boosts would give me an outsized advantage in a lot of situations…so Charisma it is.

It would depend on the tech.

Low tech: e.g. detect and destroy incoming weapons…if a single major power had this, it would bad. They maybe emboldened to use their weapons (both nuke and conventional), as their perfect defense would keep their assets (people, places, weapon systems) safe.

High tech: e.g. directed EMP type weapon that could eliminate any weapon world wide at launch, this would eliminate the MAD doctrine. No-one would be able to launch nukes at anyone. Conventional war would likely have the same driving factors that it does today. But also, it may not get “car bomb” nukes, so nuclear war still possible, just in a very different mode.

Super high tech: e.g. some crazy quantum detection and elimination of weapons that haven’t been fired. This would be terrible, basically the group/state that has this power eliminates its rivals ability to retaliate with a proportional response. They instantly become the major threat in the world, this would destabilize any alliances that they have, no one would believe them if they said that they also disabled their own nukes. This would put the world on the edge of WW3 in a heartbeat.

Nothing about it in the official checks but there may be biases against various disabilities.

Risk/benefit ratio.

The benefit is X the risk is Y, but the risk increases with excess weight, at some point Y exceeds X. Once the risk exceeds the benefit, it no-longer makes sense to perform the procedure.

From the patient point of view, the likelihood of a bad outcome is above the likelihood of a good outcome. They would be worse off getting the procedure; but likely they are only considering the good outcome and wishing away any bad outcome.

From the doctors point of view, they are considering both outcomes and trying to communicate to the patient that it’s not a good option for them. There is also the opportunity cost to consider, they could be helping someone else that is more likely to have a good outcome.