I hear it’s something leftists talk about when they don’t want to do things that they associate with being liberal
I hear it’s something leftists talk about when they don’t want to do things that they associate with being liberal
I was going to post this, after finally watching it and realizing it was an incredible video.
If this is the kind of post that gets downvoted around here, the community is cooked. Lurking Reddit is the better alternative, at least that place tends to let the cream rise to the top occasionally
Have you actually seen anybody change their minds, or are you just perceiving more pro Israel people?
Same people who say comedy is dead because they can’t make edgy jokes, complain about a harmless joke
“'Do you want to have progress or do you want to be correct?”’
Well, now I know why this got the downvotes. Great video, btw.
What do we call Assad?
Hero worship isn’t leftist and nobody should rush to defend it
Promise you won’t use it.
I don’t mind the content, but this guy starts the video by poisoning the well against himself. At least, when somebody describes using technology to launder drone strikes, that’s what it does to me.
“Kamala is not American” is coming.
She spent several years in Canada, so we have Canadian yearbook photos. And if conservatives can say Barack Obama is not American, and anti-immigrant sentiment is rising, they will definitely do it about her.
I would be very happy if Biden got elected and then immediately stepped down. He doesn’t even have to telegraph it. I don’t care.
Not Immediately Killing Every Minority 2024 wooooo
I wish there were debates in the 2024 Democratic primaries.
Okay, but did you get to watch Barbenheimer in 2023?
As the most powerful nation, literally nobody can stop us from being this stupid.
But in the event of a fascist takeover, please do try.
I really like how those first two are basic science, but somebody was actually able to innovate them into doing something useful.
I wish more technology was like this, and not whatever the crypto/metaverse/NFT/AI people are doing (mostly mistaking fluff for innovation)
I can tell you haven’t watched the video, and that you haven’t even engaged in the topic that the video is about…
What @model_tar_gz@lemmy.world said, Sorry my original post was not so clear.
I based my answer on the assumption that you would not be using somebody else’s art to train an AI. The Lora models are already brimming full of other people’s art.
Are you talking about an artist exclusively running their images through an AI model until it is capable of regenerating images that look like it was created by them and have some semblance of intent?
In order to get anything that looks remotely like what people want, I’m pretty sure they would have to upload millions of pictures of their own creation first. So most people just layer their images on top of the giant mash of ethically sketchy data that already was there.
“if there’s ten Nazis at the table and you sit down, is it now a fair and balanced table?” or something like that.
I agree with what you’ve said – we don’t need to validate a bad site.
It’s not difficult to hold two ideas simultaneously:
X is important (because people decided to make it that way)
X shouldn’t be important (and wouldn’t be, if people hadn’t made it that way)