often defined by equality typically align with the so-called left.

They talk as if they are aligned, but vote as if they are not. They put BLM in their social media profiles, then voted for the people that created the necessity for orgs like BLM to exist. They cried about kids in cages, then voted for the architect behind them.

While the liberal is part of the oppressor, he is the most powerless segment within that group. Therefore when he seeks to talk about change, he always confronts the oppressed rather than the oppressor. He does not seek to influence the oppressor, he seeks to influence the oppressed. He says to the oppressed, time and time again, “You don’t need guns, you are moving too fast, you are too radical, you are too extreme." He never says to the oppressor, “You are too extreme in your treatment of the oppressed,” because he is powerless among the oppressors, even if he is part of that group; but he has influence, or, at least, he is more powerful than the oppressed, and he enjoys this power by always cautioning, condemning, or certainly trying to direct and lead the movements of the oppressed.

Kwame Ture

Just because the general public believes something doesn’t make it correct. US democrats believe they are on the left side of the political spectrum, but by every measurable aspect they are firmly right wing, and moving further to the right

Liberals don’t like leftists in general because we make them feel like bad people. That’s why they try so hard to morally lash out at us whenever they can. They understand that many of the policies they advocate are unethical, but can’t oppose a system they benefit from, so they tear us down and lash out at us.

And that’s why I say that BlueMAGA is a disease.

Something about birds of a feather?

And the actual reason that Democrats are bloodthirsty after Stein isn’t about ‘protecting democracy™’ it’s not to prevent a Harris loss, or ‘splitting the vote™.’ It’s that if the green party gets 5% this election, they get automatic ballot access in all 50 states without having to fight for it every single election. It entitles them to public funding of elections. It would also grant them a podium at the Presidential and Vice Presidential debates.

Ban because you disagree with them? And you people say that Republicans are authoritarian.

There’s one of those right wing dog whistle buzzwords.

Anyone trying to politicize any disaster is an absolute piece of garbage.

Mickey Edwards, one of the founders and founding trustee

I’m guessing you wouldn’t know politicalcorruption if it was standing in front of demanding you vote for it

She’s on enough ballots to get 538 The DNC pushed the RNC further to the right as they kept pushing their own party to the right.

If you didn’t know about Stein I’m betting you know nothing about triangulation, the DLC, Third Way Democrats. All Bill Clinton policies to shift your party into becoming right wing conservatives they are today. Far enough right wing for people like Heritage Foundation founder members endorsing Harris. The same guy that wrote P2025.

How is Stein a spoiler? Most of us wouldnt vote for Harris even if there were no 3rd party. Harris is now backed by the guy that helped write P2025 and helped found the Heritage Foundation, and that’s how it will end up being bipartisan with liberals supporting it in a few years. Liberals are cheering in their party becoming a full fledged openly right wing party

Trump is the bed liberals made for themselves when they kept punching left and ignoring everyone telling them what would happen if you supported Clinton in 2016. And we were right about how things played out.

Hillary Clinton and her hubris blew it for Hillary Clinton. Shes directly responsible for the shithole government we currently have. I’m not sure who did more damage, her or her husband and his triangulation bullshit.

I’m guessing if you haven’t even bothered to read their website, you haven’t bothered to research what party members are at the local and state levels.

The Teamsters Guy did not endorse Trump, he used the platform to directly address the working class. If you listen to a speech he called people like Trump and the entire party out for who they are, called the entire duopoly out for who they are,

I’ve been following this POS since late 80s, Grifters are going to grift and con men are going to con.

He doesn’t need to show them. He’s already said, “I don’t care about you. I just want your vote.”

It is literally on their website

You know as well as I do that election math is just as hard to understand as toilet paper math. Election math says the 3% that voted for third party candidates is always the cause of them losing the election and never the 15+% that defected or refused to continue voting for them.