That makes sense but I think real reason is they get off doing something so terrible and evil and immoral. I get it.
That makes sense but I think real reason is they get off doing something so terrible and evil and immoral. I get it.
Ein zwei drei. Rammstein.
That’s not how it’s defined. 0.99… is the limit of a sequence and it is precisely 1. 0.99… is the summation of infinite number of numbers and we don’t know how to do that if it isn’t defined. (0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009…) It is defined by the limit of the partial sums, 0.9, 0.99, 0.999… The limit of this sequence is 1. Sorry if this came out rude. It is more of a general comment.
Don’t forget Gorgonzola Larson.
This is amazing.
One more post bro. Bro pls we’ll figure out en passant bro. I promise bro just a bigger post bro. One more and we’ll solve chess bro. Give me 2048 up votes bro pls bro.
Check this out. It puts everything I thought that was, you know, more ethical to use to the harmful section and suggests some unknown and probably not very useful today stuff. Can someone explain if they have good points or not?
I recently learned there are people that think emacs and vi are bloated. They like acme or sam or something. Iceberg is so deep.
What is the worst could happen if I click on a random link on a brand new computer?
Edit: This should have a more or less concrete answer right? Maybe there is a competition with this idea?