They were missing some punctuation when the made that statement it should actually read “rules-based? International order!”
They were missing some punctuation when the made that statement it should actually read “rules-based? International order!”
Ssj 100 has a very spotty safety record.
Doesn’t flint still not have clean water?
We can do that, but first let’s make sure everyone on the planet has clean water first.
This is one of the reasons why he was a climate denier. He will never have to live with the consequences of his actions.
Just one more number line bro
Using violence to achieve a political aim? Can someone help me answer this crossword question. It’s nine across.
You have a nuclear triad. Even if all the silos went kaput (extremely unlikely) and everyone knew it there are still nuclear subs somewhere in the world carrying nukes. The truth is you only need to have enough functional nuclear weapons to make any attack a very bad day for everyone. That number isn’t that high given a nuclear weapons destructive capacity.
Doesn’t he try to pretend that he’s natty?
Nothing legal that anyone can do to stop them
WITH NO SURVIVORS
I’m just wondering what that elsewhere entails. If they aren’t strict about it I could imagine councils just pointing to land far away from anything and saying ‘see we provided an alternative’.
Doesn’t that intensification policy come with a huge out in the form of councils just saying that intensification will destroy the area’s ‘character’?
I hear a palm-systolic murmur
Nah, but if you’re planning a climate protest or are about to whistleblow some warcrimes/corruption you’re absolutely fucked.
Fun fact. If you come to Australia the border force can basically do the same thing. Take a burner with you when you travel, it’s not worth the hassle at the airport. Bonus points, if you lose your phone or get it stolen it won’t hurt as much as if it happened to your main device.
No he won’t. Batman wasn’t the good guy
It can be both