So bottom line. Start putting the non tech consumer first or we’ll forever be stuck in this “almost mainstream” category forever.

I’m okay with that.

“Mainstream” users are getting stupider. Even Windows is to difficult for them. They want the Apple walled garden with a subscription plan for their devices and no permissions to do anything that a corporation doesn’t want you to do.

Fuck. That.

It’s an archive, or sometimes a museum. It remains government property.

https://www.archives.gov/presidential-libraries

Or in Trump’s case maybe they’d open a casino…

What’s you point (if any)?

Remember when liberals were whining about how Democrats weren’t listening to them on student loans and then wouldn’t vote for Harris?

Ok. That’s on you though.

Anything at all given to a politician should under any circumstances should be considered to be a bribe.

Yes anything.

Do you think I’m defending Trump or something? Or do you not understand what a “conviction” is?

Sorry. I mean “RAAAAWR TRUMP BAD HE DID RAPE AND IS CONVICTED OF BEING BAD”

Back to your circle jerk.

And in a civil trial you simply need to show that he was more likely than not to have done it. A criminal trial has a higher standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

It’s not just word games.

“truth matters”?

Also the standard for a civil case is “preponderance of the evidence” rather than “beyond a reasonable doubt” so it’s more than just pedentry.

I like that “liberal” was the offensive part of that rather than “you make shit up”.

Did you just call E. Jean Carrol a porn star?

She hasn’t alleged rape? Do liberals just make things up like they claim magats do? Surely “both sides” don’t just make up stuff?

… Neither is Trump? He was convicted of fraud.

I mean…

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/well-known-right-wing-influencers-duped-to-work-for-covert-russian-operation-u-s-prosecutors-say

Most maga nuts are protestant.

But what law has been broken? Google can label it “The Gulf of Space-X Debris” and violate no law.

I hate the move to rename it as well but… Good luck with that. I can’t see why any court would even entertain such a suit.

Ohhh, Mr. “gotcha question” showed up.

Feel free to complain that I didn’t answer your question like you deserve one

Peaceful does not mean lawful. You can peacefully break the law.

Sure… But…

The law is not always right - that is why it has the facility to be changed - and when laws are wrong it is a good citizen’s duty to break them, as that is the first step to changing them.

Don’t be vague. We’re talking about trespassing. Somebody peaceably trespassing in your living room would be a pretty big deal.

It’s fine that they protested, but expect to be arrested when you refuse to vacate a building you’re trespassing in.