reddit refugee

  • 4 Posts
  • 432 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle




  • There is a solution, it’s called insurance. I know that you wouldn’t get your family heirlooms back

    Then it isn’t exactly a solution, is it? The jewelry probably only would appraise for <$1000 (probably far less). It’s not about the monetary cost.

    but neither would you being armed but not home.

    Yeah…? I don’t get this line of argument. This just in - guns only effective when there’s a human there to operate it. No shit…

    You’re simultaneously arguing that guns are overkill to solve theft and that guns don’t solve theft.

    I fear that you could end up shooting a porch pirate in the back while claiming self defense.

    The state I live in currently wouldn’t allow for me to use deadly force to protect property. But states I’ve lived in in the past sure would. As of now, I would have to be in fear of great bodily harm or death in order to employ deadly force and that’s the standard I will follow. Just keep in mind that many robberies involve a deadly weapon on the perpetrators side which is an immediate green light on my end.













  • You’ve made an analogy about preparedness and let the assumption hang that that makes both things equal.

    No. It doesn’t do that at all. Nothing in my comment should be construed as to equate the wearing of seat belts and the carrying of firearms. They are different things, meant for different purposes, with different consequences for their misuse.

    The analogy demonstrated ways in which they are the same - having it and not needing it is usually what happens and needing it and not having it can be very bad.

    Edit: Y’all think Eliza Fletcher would have been better off carrying that day?