

Bruh, just let him believe it. Trying to argue against keeping NASA isn’t the best angle, atm.
Bruh, just let him believe it. Trying to argue against keeping NASA isn’t the best angle, atm.
It’s not that the face is unbelievable, it’s the weird, high definition of the details compared to the rest of the photo. If it was 2015, I’d confidently say they copied a better quality picture of his face over this one.
wtf is up with that thumbnail image? Either a mid shop job or a weird ass image-gen on just the face. Just…why?
It’s almost like they were responding to the other bullshit claim you made.
And your attempt to misdirect is just pathetifc. Do you think people can’t read what you yourself wrote one comment above?
Hmmm. I don’t think I’d count it myself, but I get it. At the very least, it surely gets credit for being so foundational for modern fantasy, which is a bit more folkorey imo.
Also just overall shittier. Every time I stream something these days, it’s pretty much guaranteed to pause/buffer or atomatically lower the quality even over fiber. I’m not going to pay for a subpar product.
I just see pizza. Yum.
Why does matter. A lot. Just pointing to something and saying it’s a problem doesn’t help. You need to know why it happened to have any chance of changing things. That you and epic both apparently think throwing cash around should solve it suggests little will actually be done.
It’s always wild to see Valve be blamed for another company shooting themselves in the foot (or in this case, yet another company entirely).
The headline had me thinking it was some convoluted critique of his decisions, but no, she’s actually just pissy about her shoes and her uncle is nothing more than an aside.
Good news - you can block entire instances on current Lemmy. No need to go community by community.
Bad news - it does nothing about the users. You’ll still see their comments and posts elsewhere.
Again, my point hasn’t got anything to do with artists making money.
A lie is not a fairy tale. Also, shoving politics into a discussion of story telling is disruptive and unhelpful.
Unhelpful and off topic.
That’s ok. I think it more so matters what the tales become rather than what they start as.
To be clear, I’m not trying to argue against artists getting paid. I just think folk-tales transcend that, you know? I’ve added to my main post to explain myself a bit better.
That’s what I’m getting at. The old tales are obviously still available, but it feels like there’s certainly more recent things that could qualify and I can’t think of anything specifically. Maybe it’s just recency that makes them feel less “classical”. I dunno.
I suppose that mostly fits. Though it feels a bit…I dunno…corporate? What I’d consider classic tales were, I believe, more-so stuff like passed on folk tales rather than for-profit media. Maybe that’s just unavoidable these days.
Maybe.