I understand you’re excited, but aren’t you overdoing it a bit?

hell yeah 😎 lesbianism (or rather, yuri, since it’s a drawing).

okaaay… So:

Euclid (guy from ~2500 years ago) wrote a book called “Elements” where he described how various geometrical figures could be constructed with using only circles and straightlines (and their intersections).

This is one example from that book: How to construct the equilateral triangle.

uh oh. better check with your local mathematician.

step 1. draw a circle A step 2. draw a circle B with the same radius and with the origin on the circle A. step 3. connect the three points (origins of two circles) and any intersection of the circles with each other, and you get an equilateral triangle.

In fact not. I may be awkward, but I’m not evil or cruel. So that’s that.

no worries, it is still funny to me

you could start with FOSS software.

Source: https://feddit.org/post/47132

I’m stealing sharing/redistributing this:

https://feddit.org/post/267802

I haven’t seen the alien franchise, but I agree with the rest.

To me, it seems to be a problem with IP (“intellectual property”). Setting IP higher should in theory advance private research and investment, while causing scarcity to the public having to rely on these services. Low IP means more equality within society, but also slower research/progress.

Personally I think that spaceflight is only at its very beginning; And it should be heavily invested and researched into. And stronger commercialization of space flight can help with that, IMO.

PeerTube go!

Solar panel “overcapacity” are literally saving the climate right now.

… not the onion?

Could somebody figure out what the limit of this sequence is? Something like the ultimate meme.

I think geothermal is a scam?

I remember reading somewhere that geothermic heat basically doesn’t replenish (or only does so at geological timescales), and by extracting heat from underground we’re basically depleting the underground heat reservoir, leading to shrinkage of the ground and therefore possible cracks in buildings.

TL;DR: It’s not truly renewable, but rather renewable only on geological timescales (similar to fossil fuels).

You could make the same argument about anything else.

“Nutrition and proper healthcare are obviously very important, so there should be public backing behind them.” (Which btw I support)

Is this fair?

Is this sane?

What is normal?