Nee dit is gebruikelijk. Je zorgt er gewoon voor dat het oude bestuur niet meer verantwoordelijk is voor wat jullie doen. Dat is wel zo netjes.

Daarnaast zijn er bepaalde bevoegdheden, denk aan bank- of juridische zaken, die je alleen mag doen als bestuurder. Daar heb je due inschrijving gewoon voor nodig.

Nah I disagree, people can also send articles to friends

You are right, but know that it can be hard for someone to judge claims.

And to answer OP: I’d say try to read qualitative, well established newspapers. They often have various overview articles and if you read articles from a couple of them then you should get a diverse view

And that penalty was not deserved

Pff what an aggressive players

I think your point here is relevant.

One can never truely evaluate its own competence.

A degree, or good reviews from collegues are good indications you are competent. But also these are not proof: it could be a result of incompetent collegues, or an education that was not that good.

Not having a degree, but saying you know for sure to not have any Kruger raises lots of eyebrows for me: you do not know what you do not know.

Coming back to op’s original question: the correlation comes from that education shows you what you do not know. You are getting involved with all kinds of subjects, and you get a grasp of how many there is left to learn and how smart certain things are. You might for example have never thought about the complexity of a compiler. This can make you feel dumber than if you would have never found out these fields existed.

Imo I think kruger is much more harmful than imposter