• 1 Post
  • 38 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • No, I think it’s, maybe, a little bit different. So, I’ve known him a long time indirectly, not directly very much, and he was always of white heritage, and he was only promoting white heritage, I didn’t know he was orange, until a number of years ago when he happened to turn orange, and now he wants to be known as orange. So, I don’t know, is he white or is he orange - but, you know what, I respect either one




  • hemmes@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhy The Left Should Care About Privacy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Always cracks me up to see people who champion open source alternatives hate on communism.

    This isn’t about “drawing comparisons” this is about how you don’t understand why someone would champion open source software and hate on communism…because of course people hate on fucking communism, you dope.

    It’s proven time and time again that communist governments bring suffering to their people. Like, some fucked up shit. Like starvation, inequality, and lack of basic human rights.

    Whereas open source software can be educational, build cost effective solutions for people and businesses, and empower people’s lives.

    You see the difference?



  • hemmes@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhy The Left Should Care About Privacy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    You shouldn’t feel that way, because communism has absolutely nothing to do with open source software.

    Communism is a political ideology.

    Open source software is a licensing technique for creators and developers. Mostly so that no one has to worry about getting sued if they want to implement or modify said software. You think a communist government would even allow the use of open source software over government issued/approved software?


  • hemmes@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlWhy The Left Should Care About Privacy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Yeah, but you’re also wrong about the gun rights. They’re trying to enact sensible laws, not strip gun rights.

    The most [egregious] recent example is the legality of arm braces.

    It’s not egregious, that’s called a sensible conversation.

    Why do gun fanatics need these types of guns anyway? What are you hunting, dragons? It’s so cringe to me when gun enthusiasts get all upset about responsible gun laws - they just want to shoot everything and anything with the most firepower they can acquire. God forbid they have to earn the right to own such a weapon.


  • Democrats believe that we can reduce gun violence while respecting the rights of responsible gun owners. We believe we should expand and strengthen background checks for those who want to purchase a firearm – because it shouldn’t be easier to get a gun than a driver’s license.

    That is not taking your precious guns away, it’s requiring you to not be a complete moron before acquiring one. Which is apparently why you have a problem with the proposal.