You actually can use I2P with JS disabled as many eepsites work without it.
You actually can use I2P with JS disabled as many eepsites work without it.
NixOS not the major inspiration for immutables, consumer OSes like Android and ChromeOS are. But yes, NixOS has some influence even it don’t get the idea of immutable distros well.
GNU Taler is inferior anyway, and it has been existing for many years with exact zero of usage.
Imagine reinventing Chaumian e-cash 40 year later and promoting it as a innovative approach in digital payments.
Only 101?
After using Silverblue for some time I tried to use Arch again, and pacman had failed at installation process. A easy fix for that is to be like: 1. Get list of all the installed packages; 2. Install all these packages again with --force. But after using immutables the situation is just meh.
And also now I dislike package managers which require to be used with sudo, and cannot ask for permissions with polkit.
So. BTW, I don’t use Arch.
Do not use Apple products. -> Problem solved.
Seems that you cannot access flathub.org for some reasons, a networking issue probably.
Fedora is Fedora and uBlue is uBlue, a separate project. Blaming Fedora for uBlue issues is like blaming Ubuntu for Mint issues.
And on Silverblue issues on updated happen from time to time. On immutable distros such issues won’t break the system unrecoverable, this is the whole reason for immutables, but there are no promises for lacking of issues.
And you are disappointed because you have encountered two different issues at once. But it is a purely random event, and I have not noticed any changes in frequency.
But saying about Silverblue, I think probably it doesn’t get much attention from the Fedora project lately, because few recent releases didn’t have any improvements either.
Oh, I must post it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dzj-DKG8-k
Translation: https://vocaloidlyrics.fandom.com/wiki/ミント_(Mint)
Fedora Silverblue, but OK, well, maybe openSUSE Aeon also.
GNOME
Ethereum Foundation is not Ethereum in the same way how Mozilla Foundation is not Firefox.
Ethereum disclosed the incident in a blog post
Ethereum is a blockchain, it cannot write posts. But well, at least they don’t write it as “Etherium”.
Flatpak haters hate new apps anyway.
It could be private or could be not. But in a world of total financial surveillance and initiatives like ChatControl, I doubt it will be really private.
If a person is smart an has personal opinions about everything or if they are a person of power I won’t trust them. Because how can I prove they are a true believer and not a liar or sociopath?
If a person is average human who thinks what the crowd thinks then I won’t care.
Better not having different regions at all.
Silent Payments are just stealth addresses for Bitcoin. There already be some earlier implementations, for example PayNim in Samourai Wallet. But the new thing is finally a general standard proposed for wallets.
It allows to create new Silent Payment address which never appear on the blockchain. Instead, the sender of a transaction will derive an unique regular address controlled by the recipient. Similar to Monero yes. The only thing it gives: one cannot naively check the balance or the transaction history of a SP address.
If it will be adopted it can improve privacy on Bitcoin slightly, but… It’s a completely client-side feature which does not require protocol changes and could be implemented like from the day one of Bitcoin. Silent Payments are new only because it uses Taproot, and the previous thing was BIP 47: Reusable Payment Codes, which has about zero usage. Just because bitcoiners don’t care much about privacy. There is only a small minority of users who cares.
For more serious privacy hidden amounts are a must have feauture. And in the past at least bitcoiners were strongly against it, because they care about transparency, audibility and trust to the system more than about privacy. Potentially, some privacy protocol can be implemented on L2, but L2s are often centralized and cannot withstand governmental pressure. But in theory yes, they could have strong private payments on L2, but this rather won’t happened on L1 in near decades. Even on Ethereum where such protocols are possible for few years now, projects are still in development.
In short: the problem with privacy in Bitcoin is not technical, it is more about culture and a lack of demand from the Bitcoin community. Imagine that bitcoiners will promote some strong privacy improvement for which Binance and other exchanges could delist BTC, or the protocol will become more complex for understanding by an average human.
Net-zero in 2030 is a lie. Google, Microsoft, whoever, - doesn’t matter. It’s only five years left. I don’t even think that bigcop can go from increasing carbon emissions to decreasing before 2030.
Be younger.