![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/bae905b8-0357-4d8f-aeee-8c3227e76c8c.png)
More?
More?
As a non native English speaker I thought that some furry guy decided to change storage by stowage, because uwu.
Then I looked up at word reference.
So the myth about most of the Navy are weebs is true. That or maybe most of the population are weebs.
Wearing weeb stuff in your school backpack okay, but do you really have to wear that patch in the military…
Hey but cool moustache!
Because you have smaller steps. When flying very low for example helicopters it makes mor sense to have smaller steps.
How old the computer has to be? An X220 is okay?
Desert camo golf cart?
Yeah I’ve seen it on twitch. We are joeover.
What of I told you there is an easier way of blocking ads: noscript.
Ah, that should be easy. Hahahha.
The only place where feet makes sense as a unit is in aviation. And I think that’s it.
1$ a minute??? How do I make this scam?
What’s wrong with having a some year old software? Does it do what you need? Yes. Then what? I have all I need on Debian. Why should I care of new updates. Security? Yes we have Debian security because of that. Look, y’all had the xyz backdoor package in your systems because it was new. Me as a Debian stable user I didn’t have to deal with it. Did I lose something by not having the latests software? No. Well maybe less crashes.
Most privative software also gets weekly updates. Does it make it better? No. You may prefer that.
Also I don’t get the point about the version numbering of Debian packages. Every team uses the versioning they want.
From my experience software that updates a lot tends to break old features a lot too.
Debian suporting freesoftware projects or other stuff doesn’t look as a relevant argument. I mean if you prefer using privative stuff and using that kind of software. Do whatever you like with your Google/Facebook/Apple friends.
But don’t come intoxicate the community with this bullshit.
You can always adapt to your how repo. But yeah, that’s the point. If you can trust people to make changes on a repo then you should be able to trust them in using some kind of commit structure.
Generic names are probably used in order to crate a familiar, easy to remember, structurized commit format.
You can always water it down. The point is to have some order in the commits. Otherwise is just messy.
The cameraman :/
Please use Conventional Commits. Simple and easy to use. Plus it is very easy so combine with Versioning techniques like Semantic Versioning.
I also need to do this expermient for scientific purposes. Any candidates?
Well now chinese companies that use free softwware don’t have an excuse to share their modifications of their software product.
He seeks vengeance