warum spricht OP von sich in der 3. Person?

canon eos m50 with tele objective. i recently got a new one (tamron 70-300) so i could zoom in more on cats from the around the house.

not sure what DSLR means but it was shot with a proper camera i would say

uhm yeah i didn’t think about people having that problem and i didn’t know that was a lot. I will consider it for my next post

sorry, i meant in your dear friends souffles case

also very nice

i woud expect more expertise from a side called “yarnspirations”. They don’t seem to know their yarns, why whould i believe anything they say?!

usually my mom uses the first when things/tools/equipment/objects do not work like they intended to do. or simply if she expected more the second one is is usually if someone or something looks ugly or if someone missbehaved or did something wrong. the third is mostly used when something is very ugly, of bad quality, just like in you case, tastes bad

The background is crocheted and not knitted.

sure… 9-8 min per job interview including welcoming the candidate, smalltalk, talking about the bullshit role you have to offer, listening to the candidates speech about why they are the best match for the bullshit role, asking critical questions about hypothetical job situations, pressing the candidate to buy a pyramid-scheme soda, saying goodbyes and escorting the candidate out.

sure that sounds realistic

beloved alternatives my mom usually drops:

“das ist nicht die Wucht in Tüten” (this ain’t the might in bags)

“damit kann man keinen Blumentopf gewinnen” (one won’t win a planting pot for that)

“das lockt niemanden vom ofen hervor” (nobody will be lured from behind the oven with that)

the lashes are upside down 😔

The police officers legs are missing or she is just one on the legless hovering kind.

I’m not an expert either but my first thought was, that bright, opaque and pastel colors are the most difficult ones to start with because one needs a lot of layers to make it look even and this automatically results in rather thick layers that are brittle and chip easyly. In my experience shear shimmery polishes are easier to use because the shimmery pigments are more forgiving when it comes to inhomogeneities in application. Regarding the top coat you used it looks like it was just an unlucky coice and it seems to have absorbed something you where in contact with. Like dirt or strongly tinted food. You could try the scientific approach and use your topcoat on a blank nail and subject it to the same type of substance and see if it also gets this yellowish stain. If yes, the top coat is trash, if not it reacted with the polish underneath so you still have to find a different combo. It is also possible, that the top coat is overly sensitive to UV-light, is old or has this as a side effect of it’s polymerisation reaction. Also possible is, that your second layer was not entirely dry of did dissolve the layer underneath which may have caused the diffusion of components that where not supposed to hang out together. (But that is a bold theory).

In my experience several very thin layers are better than to few very thick layers and as already said, shear shimmery colors are easier to start with and the layers can be thinner

I would try a different top coat either way (possibly from the same brand, as this increases the likelyhood of compatibility)

Considering that white is among the most difficult colors (imo) you did an awesome job, though

Edit: now that i thought about it, it is possible that white and pastel colors are probably higly filled with mineral powder, making them very prone to chipping/flaking/breakinganfd that probably increased your desire to protect it with layers that were simply too thick

Good to know and bad for Geezer

Well, i don’t usually date women, so can not really tell what is a “woman”-thing or a “man”-thing to do. It is possible that it is just a “human”-thing. However, the post was specifically asking for our experiences with men, so…

Maybe late disclaimer: this is just my experience (as i said), my experience does not mean your experience is not true/valid/plausible/meaningful. Women can also be at fault/problematic/the problem (obviously and nobody even claimed that). Not all men are like that (obviously and nobody even claimed that).

This reminds me of the moment i was actively listening to the lyrics of "paranoid” for the first time (i heared the song before, i just didn’t really listen)

Finished with my woman 'Cause she couldn’t help me with my mind

And i thought:

Well, Ozzy, maybe that’s because:

• she wasn’t supposed to
• it was not her job
• she might have been occupied with her own mind, which can be plenty of work for one person alone
• you probably did not pay her a psychiatrist salary
• she probably was not trained to do so
• if she was trained and you didn’t pay her, then why should she?
• if she was not trained eventhough you paid her, then why could she?
• if she is not trained and you didn’t pay her, then why would she?
• and if she is trained and you did pay her then it is not your woman it is your therapist with whom you engage in a prosessional relationship
• your expectation is unrealistic in the first place, how dare you writing lyrics like that, making persons think that those are valid expectations to have.

Anyway, in my experience men never really want “help” or change things. They just like complaining about stuff. They complain about their own flaws and especially yours (his partners) flaws, flaws in the world, the politics, persons at work, the boss. In my experience whenever i offered help to deal with some stuff they usually complained about, they don’t want to hear it. They don’t even want to try. They just expect you to be some sort of sponge that absorbs all the rambling about everything that sucks for them.

• also, Ozzy, what did you do to help your mind?

How they managed that their application for an account got accepted.

• Dänische Kinderserien
• Alpensalamander
• upconverting nanoparticles
• germanic languages
• Plumeau

I wonder how they got in