A slow but steady genocide seems to be the strategy
A slow but steady genocide seems to be the strategy
That’s Trump’s argument (democrats might change their candidate yet again) but with her gaining clear popularity in many swing states, it’s very difficult to make the argument that “she is not important”.
But lets say for argument’s sake that Kamala is so bad and unpopular that he is guaranteed to win the election and debating her is not worth his time, why bother with rallies then?
The far right in Israel make the far right in the US look like angels in comparison
He was coming strong in front of Biden. if he back down now he’d appear scared
I cant watch right now, whats the TLDR?
try soaking one of then in bleach overnight. That might destroy it but it also might remove all the colors including logo and solve your problen.
if that worked u can do the same with the other tshirts
Wish you speedy recovery. Sorry about your car.
My guess is that laptop 1 is connected to the HD through USB2 not USB3. Or u r using USB hub
thanks but how do you know what interface is available where?
You’re telling Israel is doing what is doing with no US protection whatsoever?
Nothing as US doesn not protect China
wow. Wish I knew about this before. Is there a list of available interfaces?
It takes a particularly ideological sort to choose Lemmy over the much more established Reddit
I - among many - chose Lemmy because Reddit banned 3ed party apps. Not for any ideological reason
miles is not a unit I am familiar with. I certainly wasn’t suggesting the woman was speeding or slowing down just that her speed (whatever it was) should be taken in consideration when estimating the severity of impact.
Of course this is all theoretical since we do know for a fact that two people were killed
But take into account that the woman was also driving at certain speed when he hit her. If she was driving at 100MPH then his speed relative to her was just 41MPH
The only way to prove that a news agency is reliable, is by not finding any fake/false/wrong news on their websites - that they didn’t publish correction for -. The duty of providing proof lies on the accuser, if you accuse gurdian of wrong doing you’d need to the provide a proof.
This is the reason I didn’t call commondreams fake or unreliable, I don’t have a proof.
its not a known news agency. I know you could say just because they are small doesn’t mean they are untrustworthy and you’d be right but they are questionable. for example have you ever heard of commomdreams journalist anywhere in the middle east? If they are not the source of the news but rather copying it from elsewhere then it’s better to link to the source.
According to mediabiasfact, this website is highly reliable while the guardian reliability is mixed (one level above low reliability )
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/
agrre to disagree I guess
The source is commondreams.org? Am not defending IDF but we are better than spreading news with questionable sources
Maybe saw it but pressured to use him? a brother in law would know too much about her personal life if you know what I mean