I doubt it. But I hope you’re right.
mostly inactive, lemmy.ca is now too tainted with trolls from big instances we’re not willing to defederate
I doubt it. But I hope you’re right.
I signed it but I don’t really get what’s the goal here other than rectifying a minor semantic issue
It’s always a shame when iconic bits are disrupted by development, but I honestly can’t say I care a lot about that cross staying there and I’d be fine with moving it. It’s supposed to represent the un-gentrified Vancouver, so it’s ironically on-brand to move it to a place that’s less gentrified.
Just say yes to fuck up their metrics.
“Yes but don’t contact me on this number again, it’s my work phone”
To help fund this foreign tourists should pay an entry tax depending how long they stay.
Hmm, I mostly agree with the rest of your comment but you lost me there.
If it were free but buses and trains showed up 1/3 as often it’s not worth it.
I think free fare advocates aren’t advocating for this hypothetical tradeoff, it’s probably for increased funding to replace fare revenue
Squamish becoming a commuter town is a bit tragic, but trains would be nice yeah
Yep. It’s cognitive dissonance. Presumed innocence & welfare for me, discipline and punishment & rugged individualism for thee.
I never understand why people don’t want criminals reformed, just locked up.
It is pretty easy to understand. People are interested in their personal safety above all else, way more than they care about inefficient use of public resources and human tragedies brought by a carceral system. Many favor systems that error to the side of unjustly punishing over a system that accepts the inherent trade-offs of pursuing common good.
In other words, to some folks, criminals aren’t people so we shouldn’t worry about what’s good for them - all worry is dedicated to making the lives of white flighters as stress-free as possible. TLDR: snowflake conservatives.
I don’t think it is a “problem”, but it gets really boring / bleak when every single house looks identical to one another.
It looks boring at first, but over time they come to represent the times of their adoption. I think Vancouver Specials, despite their pathetic looks, have a charm that carries its history and significance. Something similar is bound to happen. And at least this time it’s not a single design, there are quite a few.
A nurse would quite literally crosscheck 50 blood markers in a matter of seconds
Yes, but also a nurse has bazillion other things to do. That’s probably why, as the CBC journalist reports, “the nursing team usually checked blood work around noon”. So even though it costs a second to do, it’s done was done once a day. Now it’s done continuously because it’s an alert system instead of something the nurse has keep an eye on.
In this specific case, the fever + high WBC would be more than enough for a nurse to know that something was up. It makes me think that adding AI just adds another step.
Sure, there’s another computation step. But that’s cheap. Nurse time is the bottleneck. From the POV of a nursing team, before, there was a step (check blood pressure at noon), now there are no steps. They replaced a process of checking some numbers with an automated metric-based alarm. This is textbook operations process optimization, great for everyone involved.
I think this is exactly the case for automation to be useful without negatively impacting the professional. It’s not a matter of nurses having the knowledge or expertise, but a tool that takes away the toil of monitoring - which is boring, easily skipped or performed badly by a tired brain, and is trivially interpretable. If a thingamabob beeps louder and makes the nurse pay attention to the blood cell count, the human is still in the loop of decision making.
that just because the UCP received 54-ish% of the popular vote in the last provincial general election, it doesn’t follow that 54% of the population of Alberta is anti-trans.
It does mean that 54% is willing to promote UCP even though UCP as an institution is supportive of anti-trans politics. So while not everyone in those 54% might be anti-trans themselves, they are consciously supporting anti-trans politicians, and are effectively helping the anti-trans ideology.
Blind spots are blind because there’s no direct path from any part of the bike to the driver’s eyes. If the design is specifically worried about being in a blind spot, ironically the better design is to concentrate the LED power with narrow beam of light so the bike can cast light further away outside the blindspot.
Anyway, being in a blindspot is dangerous even for cars that have those ridiculously overpowered bright headlamps. When a driver says the “cyclist came out of nowhere” it just means the driver was driving carelessly. More lamps won’t solve that.
Interesting idea but I’m not sure the benefit is worth the cost and the bulky gadget. Regular bike lights don’t have such a narrow beam of light, unless by “regular” they mean the most laser-focused bike lights of the market. My two lights are pretty diffuse.
In what situations are said cyclists hard for motorists to see that a combination of normal bike light and high viz material won’t work? Foggy day, cyclist and driver are perpendicular on an intersection? If it’s foggy, the fog works as light diffuser. If it’s not foggy, any piece of reflective material would do the trick… unless truckers are not turning on their headlights in total darkness, at which point normal bike lights are enough again.
Having spent that much time in a truck, he understands what makes cyclists difficult to see.
lol no, that’s not how it works, there are professionals that dedicate their lives to studying vehicle lighting
Lift or Cardero’s. Not because of the food, just because I’d want to enjoy the view.
Welp, at least it’s a non-profit and the amount of people under care is increasing.
I’d say this kind of thing is in the best 1% of UCP moments, considering everything else. It’s a low bar but still.
It’s exactly as (un)secure as I expected. It’s a wireless device made by bike part manufactures… can’t expect better, realistically.
Still, I wouldn’t recommend someone against buying one because of this. The threat model for cyclists is getting maimed by vehicles or psychopaths laying booby traps out there. Hackers messing with my gear shifting is the least of my worries.
I don’t understand. Ending Translink to fund who?
Now that the day is past, today I saw in the news what each candidate was doing yesterday. What’s the story behind Á’a:líya Warbus being a Conservative candidate in Chilliwack?
I’m not surprised to occasionally see LGBTQ+ folks joining hands with conservatives because there’s one thing that usually threads the needle there: class warfare. I can also understand the poor working class that votes conservative: rugged individualism and “traditional values”. But I still can’t understand indigenous voters going conservative… Rustad is clearly an enemy!? 🤷♂️