![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
Only until the next email
Only until the next email
Yeah, an Auxiliary Propulsion Unit. Seeing one deployed is pretty normal, but when an aircraft has two or more out at the same time, you should be leery of deeper problems with the main engines.
The Spider-Man games come close, but that first Arkham game was just so well done
When you put it that way it sounds really dumb.
I didn’t know there was more than one agreed-upon debate. Fox is kind of a non-starter, but I only knew about one other, and I’ve been trying to keep up!
Might I suggest a fun alternative? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvrRQEchBp0
Now that’s a name I’ve not heard in a long time. A long time.
Oh boy! Can’t wait to experience the ramifications of this one!
What’s next? Gonna try to recreate Deep Impact, just to see?
Incel isn’t on your tax returns, Incel comes from the heart
It’s in this article: “The couple asked the waiter several more times to be absolutely sure the food would be allergen free before Tangsuan ordered a fritter, scallops and onion rings, the lawsuit said.”
That’s a question worth getting high over. I’ll need to ponder this.
Silenced how? Which “wrong” opinion did you express? And to which crowd?
I wonder if some sort of “truth in labeling” law could curb what gets referred to as news? Like, say what you want, but unless you can prove it you’re not allowed to call it news. Would that help to prevent the “they shouldn’t have taken me seriously” defense?
Can you help me understand the concept of tort law? Class actions are tort law, right? So a tort is a kind of rule about a law that recognizes that a law shouldn’t be interpreted to allow that, even if it wasn’t specifically illegal to begin with? Or am I more confused than I thought?
Should have checked the comments first. I read the whole damn thing waiting for the stunning conclusion, but it was just theory after theory. I guess one of them is probably correct, but I was hoping they could tell me which one.
“Not me, officer, I’m… Borodymyr Kraszynski.” I’m imagining a huge fake mustache.
I’ve always liked the idea of calling it teaching rocks to think, but maybe it’s more like using rocks to teach math to think.
Is this just an advertisement for his new book?
But still! Cooperative engagement technology isn’t new, so it would be very cool to see it make its way to drones and gun fire control systems.
I signed up for TWS almost 20 years ago, but I never really used it. Isn’t it really just for finding old service buddies?