Had no idea a boycott was happening.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Please stop with the time bound protests. You’re telling the companies to just wait you out. 🤦‍♀️

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, stop protesting if you aren’t willing to protest the right way. There are no steps to be taken in the right direction, you’re either perfect or worthless.

  • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Easiest. Boycott. Ever.

    Target sells cheaply manufactured goods at high prices. I haven’t shopped there in years already for that reason.

    • RetroSoul@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I like to go there to buy thermos. They have a clearance section that sells them for like $5. Big good ones too.

      Oh and their cheap $1 aisle that sells seasonal stuff. I like going there for Christmas time and buying cheap Christmas decorations for the workplace lol.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dear capitalist media… Target is being boycotted for being racist. And no, Target is not the victim.

    These headlines ffs…

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s CNN. They’re a heavily biased pro-Israel pro-capitalist align-with-whatever-regime corpo news service. They should just be ignored by all at this point.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They canceled their black creator products and rolled back DEI because the government said to.

        Some people can argue that’s not racism, but they’re likely the same people that argue that Elon wasn’t giving a Nazi salute.

  • Botanicals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember there are bots even on Lemmy to push the narrative that we have no power. Billionaires aren’t scared of a couple less dollars, but they are TERRIFIED of us figuring out we can organize. Let’s not fight each other let’s fight the oligarchy!

    • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      these short boycotts won’t fuck them on dollars, but there is a potential benefit: just in time economics and these long slow prediction-powered supply chains cannot handle this shit.

      • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also, I’ve heard a rumor about Target trying to stuff as much as they can into their warehouses and stock rooms in advance of Trump’s tariffs.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          that’s so cool! yeah, fuck them if they want to try to play both sides here. they want to bow, they can suffer the king’s horrible policies.

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      We only have power when a large enough group of us does something. Anything else is publicity.

      • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I agree with Botanicals. Whether you truly have an impact or not…I guess we’re arguing semantics…but simply vote with your wallet. 🙂 There is little excuse when options abound! If someone engages in behavior you really don’t like, boycott their ass. Don’t buy their product or service. If they didn’t make money, they’d quit their shit or go bankrupt. “No raindrop is responsible for the flood.”

        Look at the Bud Light boycott. Granted, enough of the people doing the boycott were uninformed consumers that bought something else owned by ABInBev, and still gave the same company their money. But others went all the way. The campaign itself was still effective, as Bud Light sales TANKED. Product went BAD. The company lost LOTS OF MONEY. They lost prominent shelf space that they will probably never get back, but who knows, never is a big word.

        You have power, little raindrop. You do.

        • the_q@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I quit eating meat because I care about animals, I limit my driving to as little as possible to lessen my impact, I use open source software exclusively, I only buy repairable tech… I’m doing what I can to lessen the suffering I, an individual, inflicts and it’s made no difference. Animals still being killed, Earth still dying, corpos still raking in record profits, people still losing their homes, jobs, lives… I understand the need to feel like you and your choices matter. That’s how people cope with all this. I’m m not like that. I see things as they are and not as I hope they might be one day if we can just not shop at Target.

      • Botanicals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I urge you to see beyond that. Of course there are people (influencers likely?) you’re thinking about that jump on band wagons, but every movement does and they play an important part even if you don’t like them. Free advertising!

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    My wife told me we are boycotting, so lets do this!

    I have 3 trans friends and as a super straight middle aged privileged all to hell white dad, fuck these corporate assholes.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      My wife lives at Target. She’s already found other places to get the essentials.

      40 days.

      Fill a target online shopping cart with every day items, stuff you would buy every week or every month, and abandon it. Nothing big or expensive, standard shit.

      Do that a few times.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 days ago

      That is the part that pisses me off so much about this. Yes. Target capitulated. Yes, Target needs to be told that’s not good.

      BUT WALTONS FUND THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION!

      This can’t be said enough, yet we can’t get a days boycott on them for fucks sake!

    • comfydecal@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Right? And why not just boycott all pubkically traded companies forever? 40 days doesn’t do much

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        ·
        3 days ago

        Because if you propose that, no one is actually going to do it.

        Doing something is always more impactful than shooting for everything and ending up doing nothing. This is a great example of a smartly thought out mass movement; it has a specific goal, and a clearly defined set of terms. Remember, you can always expand or extend. It’s far better to get a small thing moving than try to build a big thing that you never finish.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          3 days ago

          Further, a lot of dirt poor people literally rely on Walmart because Walmart was successful at gutting every other business out of their already dirt poor areas. That was literally Walmart’s business model to undersell the competition until they were the only game in town, it’s how they got so huge so fast. Large swathes of the South are like that. There’s a reason they teach their employees how to sign up for food stamps.

        • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          Also, 40 days is long enough that some people are going to change their shopping habits on a more permanent basis. Creating even a longer impact on Target.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            I don’t get why anyone complains about fixed term boycotts anyway. You can just add another 40 days if Target doesn’t get the message. It’s not like you’re signing a contract or something. Boycotts are a negotiation, and in negotiation you always leave yourself wiggle room.

            People love to get into this “Only the biggest possible action and nothing else” mindset, and then never actually take any action at all.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The one day ones are fairly pointless, but 40 is good. Give it a month and if nothing changes then you have a bit more time to try to extend it.

        • comfydecal@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          100%, perfect is the enemy of good. But it makes little logical sense to give any of these corporations any money or data

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            If you’re on the highway, need a coffee, and Starbucks is the only thing around, buy the Starbucks.

            If Amazon is the only place you can buy that thing you need, buy it from Amazon.

            There are plenty of times when the bad option is the only good option. If we teach people that boycotts have to be all or nothing - if we get into this mindset that a single latte means you’re an evil monster who supports genocide - we just engineer a state of despair.

            But if we encourage people to reduce rather than cut out, we set an easily achievable goal. And that means it’s a goal that a lot more people will strive for.

            If you want to cut out every big corporation entirely from your life, that’s an admirable personal goal, but not one that seems easy or achievable to most people.

      • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m definitely with you on that in spirit. I would starve if I actually practiced that across the board. I figure if we start from the top down, maybe we can get the co-ops to come back. Our neighborhood co-op grocery closed down not too long ago, and all that’s left are national chains.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think it’s fair to commit to reducing your purchasing from these large entities significantly. By design, these companies have made it basically impossible to get certain products except from them, so do what you need to do in those cases. But you can get a lot still from alternatives.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I’m a huge advocate of what I call “soft boycotting.” You don’t have to all or nothing this stuff. If a million people reduce their spending on a company by only ten percent, that’s just as much damage as ten thousand people dropping them entirely. And it’s a lot easier to get a million people to reduce their spending by a little than it is to get ten thousand people to go cold turkey.

            Remember, perfect is the enemy of good. A small action taken is worth far more than a big action only imagined.

      • Gerudo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Better than these one day protests that LITERALLY do nothing. At least a 40 day boycott would hit a fiscal month, vs a single day outlier protest.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is supposed to be a weeklong boycott of Amazon this month, I forget the exact date.

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It couldn’t come at a worse time for the company

    Neither could their capitulation to Trumps bigoted rhetoric.

    I got a lot of flak and eye rolls from my liberal friends a few years ago when I, as a queer woman, would criticize their Rainbow Capitalism. But Target is not an ally, they never were. They are simply a corporation that got some easy publicity in liberal spaces by showing the bare minimum decency.

    Fair weather allies, aren’t.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s why it’s our responsibility as consumers to align their shareholder interests to doing the right fucking thing. Boycotts and other consumer action are part of their calculations on what the shareholder interests are, so a large population of informed consumers who vote their conscience with their wallet will provide pressure to do the right thing.

    • WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      Target is under more pressure than companies like Walmart, John Deere or Tractor Supply, because Target went further in its DEI efforts, and it has a more progressive base of customers than those competitors.

      This is wild move for a company on its arse anyway.

  • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Putting a time limit on a boycott undermines the boycott.

    Saw this with the Loblaw’s boycott here in Canada, it was very ineffective because they can just wait it out.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, just don’t shop at Target.
      It’s strange that people forget that businesses like Target getting rid of DEI also gets rid of many disability act initiatives. There should be more outrage than just a boycott.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      From the point of view of the boycotter, having a time limit helps mentally.

      I think more people are ready to think “just buy somewhere else for a bit”. If it becomes “forever” might seem daunting.

      My two cents, not sure if this is the real reason.

      • iowagneiss@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s my thought as well. A one day boycott like the “no shopping day” does literally nothing, but 40 days can reform habits. To the extent practicable, I’m doing all my shopping at Costco now. I generally eat a lot of the same things, so bulk quantities aren’t that big of a deal to manage.

  • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I used to do nearly all my shopping there because of the policies they got rid of. Cancelled my 360 membership, getting used to buying flour 25# at a time from Costco …

  • spacesatan@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I work at the Target warehouse that supplies the northwest, should be interesting to see if this actually noticeably changes our daily product volume. Gonna hazard a guess at no probably not. I should have some idea within 24 hours thanks to just in time logistics but seasonal product could fuzz the numbers a bit.

    Works for me though, I’m mostly here for the tuition benefit and I don’t lose benefits eligibility unless I dip below 20/hr/week average which I can’t imagine happening.

    Update: Maybe, actually. Today was the lowest volume so far this week but we’re just sorta back to the volume we were running last week. We’ll see if it sticks.

    Update 2: lol, today’s volume is even higher than last week. It’s just volatile right now I guess, no discernible impact.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Target near me made their employees stay inside/keep working while it was evacuated for a bomb threat during that period of stochastic terrorism.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had heard about the boycott, but didn’t realize this was the reason. Target’s on the other side of town from me so I don’t shop there anyway, but yeah definitely not going there at all now. Fuck them.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s “funny” how capitalist media will talk about the boycott and cry agonized tears for Target…

        But never mention the “why”, especially not in headlines.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Using gift cards is OK if you’re boycotting a place, right? I mean, Target already has the money and you’d just be helping them out if you didn’t buy anything with them.

    I’m a school bus driver and I always get a lot of tips (Christmas and end of year) in the form of Target gift cards. BTW yes, I agree that tipping school bus drivers is fucking weird. We already get paid and it’s not like we’re going to drive the kids into a tree if we don’t get tipped.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Those are Christmas gifts. The parents are just showing appreciation for you already not driving their kids into a tree, not bribing you lol.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      In my old community the bus driver was part of our community, we knew her and she was amazing. She knew the kids, she welcomed them by name every morning and she made sure they got to school safe AND ok.

      The last bit is the most important part. She deserved a “tip” but in reality as someone who was part of my extended “raise my kid family” she “earned” her card and Starbucks gift card (mostly cuz she drank 7-11 coffee and I liked razzing her)

      Our current bus driver is a contractor who couldn’t give a fuck about anything except when he has to be at the stop and when he is allowed to leave, exactly where the “nah you’re too far away from the bus stop fuck you’d kid” line is.”

      It’s not always weird, but can be.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not really. The explanation is somewhat complex.

      Although target already has the money once a gift card has been purchased, they will not recognise the money as revenue until you use the card.

      Suppose my lawn mowing guy charges $50 each time he mows my lawn, and he comes 12 times a year. In January I just transfer him $600 because I don’t want to muck around with smaller payments all the time.

      When he calculates his “revenue” for January, should he include the whole $600? It would be more accurate to set aside the $550 he hadn’t really earned yet, and recognise that once he actually does the work.

      There’s more geaky accounting stuff I could say, but in summary if you want to send a message to Target management, refrain from using gift cards during the boycott.

      • barfplanet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        They don’t get to record it as revenue, but they do get to sit on the cash, earning interest etc on it. Companies loooove gift cards. It’s free money.

        For a company health perspective, it’s better to use it so they’re at least put the cost-of-goods. Best option would be to sell the gift cards to someone who was going to shop there anyways.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      We already get paid and it’s not like we’re going to drive the kids into a tree if we don’t get tipped.

      You might not do it, I however am always looking for revenue streams. If it’s for profit, it can’t be illegal.

      Looks at the health insurance industry

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    well that’s easy, I haven’t shopped there in years. They’re inconvenient, overpriced, low quality, rarely have what I’m looking for. Why would I shop there?

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    There’s a boycott? I just don’t shop there because it’s the same crap as everywhere else for more money and a worse experience.

      • TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah Amazon is cheaper and a better experience. Don’t get me wrong, there’s plenty of reasons not to shop at Amazon, but price and shopping experience are above Target.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unsarcastically but sadly, yes. It’s the same items, with the same supply chain and the same issues. But it’s at a lower cost to me. Frankly, as things get tight, we’ll all need to make decisions between our ideals and our bank accounts. I assume that most of us will lean toward preserving the bank account and reckon with our ideals later.

        • kyle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah unfortunately I know exactly what you mean. You do what you have to do to make it.