• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Disagree. There are a huge number of republican working class that need representation, and who are not the enemy.

    The anti-1% party is a much more viable proposition than going left vs right.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      Show me the conservative critique of billionaires. I know how that works on the left, but the right is about preserving power structures

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Unless one of your values is to take wealth from those that don’t share your values, this is not a critique that will lead to meaningful corrections. I guess that could be a conservative value, but now you’re just doing identity politics.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are a few Republican representatives that claim to be pro-union, which has gotten them into office. I don’t know how much they can do when both parties have been generally anti-union.

        • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          You don’t have to be the 1% to vote for them.

          Leftism literally originates from replacing monarchy and aristocracy with democracy, fighting the 1% is leftism.

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The Democrats tried that, they tried appealing to the mythical “centrist conservative” and look where that got them, it has been proven to be a failing strategy. We dont need another “bipartisan” Democrat-like party, we need a workers party.

      • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, I would love that, but if we start running a third party in national elections against the Democrats and Republicans from the left, the Republicans will win even more. If we can’t get FPTP changed I’m afraid the only option I can see is to destroy and rebuild the Democrats.

        Well I guess there’s a possibility that when Trump dies the Republicans implode. I’d love to see it but their voters always toe the line. I think this time it will be whoever right wing media decides are the new bosses.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Like Democrats, many Republicans are just voting for the “lesser evil” and aren’t really loyal to their party. They just hate Democrats.

      A new party sidesteps and allows those “lesser evil” Republican working class voters to jump ship. They will not ever vote for a Democrat, so stop being Democrats.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This idea is so simple, and the idea of it changing the course of history would be such a dumb-timeline thing, that I am 100% convinced it would work.

        It would give them the ability to talk some harsh shit on Democrats, which could work on some Republicans. But I’d still worry that the effectiveness of their propaganda machine and the tendency of conservatives to fall in line and do as they’re told would spoil it.