Meanwhile, 44 percent backed the American tradition of competing branches of government as a model, if sometimes ā€œfrustrating,ā€ system.

Why would people want to live under an authoritarianā€™s thumb? Itā€™s rooted, experts say, in a psychological need for securityā€”real or perceivedā€”and a desire for conformity, a goal that becomes even more acute as the country undergoes dramatic demographic and social changes. People also like to obey a strong leader who will protect the groupā€”especially if it is the ā€œrightā€ group whose interests will be protected. Recall the Trump supporter who, during the 2019 government shutdown, complained, ā€œHeā€™s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.ā€

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    From this and other polls it really does seem that most countries would be immeasurably improved if a good third of the population were to spontaneously combust.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      Bad news: the 1/3 authoritarian segment of society seems to be a human trait. Culture determines how the trait is expressed.

      So fire them into the sun but statistically the hierarchically-minded, active-amygdala, contrarian and cruel segments of the genome will just always be there.

      This is probably the primary challenge of the human condition: graduating from a troupe species with ling-refined tribal techniques for handling the problem individuals, to a noƶspheric global species successfully coping with with emergent problems due to mass ā€œcivilizationalā€ effects.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        True, although it might buy us time to get some shit fixed before they repopulate and start complaining about how things have improved.