• girltwink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This young trans girl i know was kicked out by her parents and moved to my city. She was hatecrimed a few weeks after she moved, and went to the police. She was convinced that they were on her side. One of the cops gave her his phone number and she got the impression that he was interested in her and was going to hook up with him. My friends and i very emphatically talked her out of it. I wonder if she would’ve survived.

  • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We need the ability to tag users on Lemmy so that when we figure out that someone is a tankie or an anti-Canadian propagandist we can tag them so that the next time we see them comment we know they are a bad faith actor and can respond appropriately (and by appropriately I mean not wasting our time trying to have a good faith discussion.)

    EDIT:

    NegativeYoda said that Sync for Lemmy had the functionality I was looking for so I checked it out.

    It does.

    I was able to (temporarily) highlight NY in red like a banned user and tag him as a tankie. This week makes my lemmy experience much less frustrating. I’ve ashtray done the same (for real) to several obvious bad actors so I don’t get drawn into a discussion with someone who has no intention of participating in good faith.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        My beliefs aren’t so fragile that I need to protect them from beliefs that don’t agree. We need to engage with the extremists. We need to call them out and let each other know that the person we are talking to is a bad faith actor who isn’t interested in a discussion or understands but to simply spread their extremist message of hate and intolerance. If we block them they continue unchallenged.

        • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we block them they continue unchallenged.

          That’s why they should be blocked at the instance level, not individual users.

          Engage them? No thanks. All that does is help train their LLMs.

          • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t like the idea of blocking people who have different ideas but who aren’t otherwise doing anything problematic. I’m talking with someone this morning who has the most ridiculous ideas about how the world works. His ideas are just nonsense and he advances them with great confidence. I have him flagged so that as soon as I saw his name come up as red this morning I knew that I needed to slow down and careful about my response. I don’t want to block him because the things he says offer a chance for people who know how the world works to respond, perhaps influencing the perception of a reader who comes along later.

            If you want to block people, by all means block them, but you’re taking yourself out of the conversation, not them. That was the problem with the blocking system on Reddit. If you blocked someone you took them out of the conversation. On Lemmy when you block someone you take yourself out of the conversation. Unless you want to operate in an echo bunker where you can only see people whose ideas agree with yours that’s a bad thing.

        • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you have the energy for that, go nuts.

          Being that the bulk of the loudmouths are bad faith trolls no sort of reasoned discussion is going to get through.

          If enough people block them they eventually get quarantined into their own echo chambers and the oxygen of getting off on pwning the libs will run out