• DistractedDev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s no proof but what else could be these people’s problem? They have to know what they’re doing to the image of people who do care about the environment. It’s not like they’re helping. I don’t get it.

    • bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      it doesn‘t seem logical to you that some people are freaking out because everybody is talking about climate change while it is clearly happening and it is becoming obvious that too little is being done too late?

      • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Man I agree with you. I just feel sick when I see harm being done to such an ancient piece of history. What reason is there for it? Go after something actually related to the problem at least.

        • bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I think very little can be done to cause public outrage, which is what they want to do. This did it. Also I see no lasting damage being done to Stone Henge. And that‘s true for all their actions, as far as I know.

          • dmention7@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            But are their actions causing public outrage at: a) the causes and purveyors of climate change, or b) the people protesting climate change?

            I don’t think the “any attention is good attention” adage applies to something as politically polarized as climate change.

            • bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              fair point. I think it is heart breaking that they seem to be losing this battle. No matter what kind of protest they choose, I keep hearing: Well, that‘s not the kind of protest I would support. So yeah, maybe they are at a dead end. But maybe not because they chose the wrong kind of protest, but because the public don‘t want change. Look at the European elections. It seems the other side‘s propaganda works a lot better, yeah.

      • DistractedDev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        All I’m really trying to say is their methods make the environmental movements look bad. I hate that. I want things to get better. I don’t think they’re doing anything to help that. Go after something relevant.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          MLK’s protests made the civil rights movement look bad. People fucking hated him at the time, despite how history has whitewashed him.

          Every effective protest pisses reactionaries and “moderates” off. If it doesn’t piss them off, it isn’t effective.

          • fishos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Except this doesn’t make me care about oil one damn bit. What I do care about it harsh penalties for the perpetrators(including community service and paying for the damage to be undone) and protecting heritage sites like this from other shitty humans. Its not activism, it’s vandalism. It has nothing to do with oil. It would be the same as setting the Mona Lisa on fire and screaming about oil. It’s just unhinged.