I’ve been seeing more often (and others have posted the same) that some of the elements of “Reddit etiquette” seem to be taking over here. Luckily I can still find discussion comments but it seems the jokes and general “downvote because I disagree” are slowly taking over.

So the question becomes is it the size or the functionality of the site? The people or popularity? What’s your thoughts?

edit: should I change it to Lemmy-hivemind? Exhibit A: the amount of downvotes without a single explanation (guessing it’s anything to do with Reddit being talked about).

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    27 days ago

    Indeed. When’s the last time we saw a well-thought-out, controversial opinion on Reddit?The system breeds behaviors that are in conflict with a high-quality, diverse discussion.

    It is for the same reason that I’m very particular about my downvotes. They are reserved for low-quality content, not that which I personally disagree with. I’d like if we could all learn to be less judgmental and more constructive so that we may all learn something meaningful. I think this is incompatible with the way that Reddit operates.

    • mrnarwall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      27 days ago

      As someone who recently switch to Lemmy, I did notice that there is a general difference in the tone of conversation. This is the first time I’ve seen it put to words

    • dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      27 days ago

      I wonder if separating relevant/irrelevant & like/dislike into two votes would have any success. Quite likely it would not, but might be worth trying.

      • Ardyssian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Would probably rename [ like / dislike ] to [ agree / disagree ] to avoid overlapping with [ relevant / irrelevant ]. To make it more robust, make voting for relevancy compulsory if voting for [ agree / disagree ].

        But the reported stats is all moot if there’s bot manipulation anyway. Also, people would most likely say it’s relevant even if it’s actually not, just because they agree with it

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      my downvotes. They are reserved for low-quality content, not that which I personally disagree with.

      There was more of that in the early days of Reddit. At some point everyone abandoned that principle, and from them on every thread became more of a battle than a conversation.