We used to have earbuds that don’t need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn’t get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

    • i_give_u_worms@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      i really don’t want to have to carry one more piece of junk, and while USB C is way better than alternatives, bending the dongle in your pocket while it is attached to the phone is a scary thought, wired earbuds make a hard right turn right out of the socket. The socket does fill with lint, I kind of get it that removing reduces loss of the phone from water damage or related assembly costs to making the socket not-a-water-vector

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Because of….? Anyway I have headphones that have a lightning jack and don’t need an adapter.

        • Welt@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          You mean the proprietary ones that came with your iPhone? Well that covers every use case anyone could ever have.

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            It certainly covers the use case for an iPhone, right? Not sure what you’re trying to say. If you don’t have an iPhone why would you care if iPhones have 3.5mm jacks?

          • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            apple also makes a usb-c one, apparently it works reasonably well and is an actual DAC unlike some which are weird passive adapters that don’t work through hubs.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        IDK. I use one and have no problem with it. My car’s bluetooth is rather unreliable at connecting, so I just us a USB C->aux cable. I’ve got no complaints. Is it as good a signal as a properly paired bluetooth digital audio connection? No. But it’s certainly as good as the old aux->aux cables I used back in the day.

    • AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Adapters are a cop out. Just put the adapters in the phone. It also means you can’t charge and listen to music.

      Also while there are some natively wired usb-c headphones, I can’t think of any. Any decent headphones will use a standard 3.5 or 6.5mm audio jack, and then the dac being built inwith those usb-c headphones means you can’t use a seperate dac, it means you can’t plug them into studio gear. It’s just so incredibly limiting.

      There is already a universal standard (3.5mm/6.5mm jack) it carries analog audio, why change to a digital connection which requires digital to analog conversion? Why not let the user be able to have a dedicated piece of gear to do that if they wish.

      No professional equipment, or even semi professional equipment uses usb-c. It’s a good old fashioned analog audio jack and it’s like that for a reason

    • Johnmannesca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I use an adapter from Walmart and it works better than a regular aux plug in a car? Do you think that the audio signal is boosted over type c?