GOP lawmakers and analysts virtually unanimous that Trump was second best to Harris in first presidential debate

Donald Trumpā€™s campaign was in damage control mode on Wednesday amid widespread dismay among supporters over aĀ presidential debate performanceĀ that sawĀ Kamala Harris, his Democratic opponent, repeatedly goad him into going wildly off-message and missing apparent opportunities to tackle her on policy.

Even with TrumpĀ insistingĀ to have won the debate ā€œby a lotā€, Republicans were virtually unanimous that Trump had come off second best in a series of exchanges that saw the vice-president deliberately bait him on his weak points while he responded with visible anger.

The Republican nominee ā€“ who took the unusual step afterwards of visiting the media spin room, a venue normally frequented only by candidatesā€™ surrogates ā€“ was non-committal on Wednesday to the Harris campaignā€™s proposal for a second debate. Despite widespread opinion to the contrary, Trump suggested she needed it because she had lost. ā€œIā€™d be less inclined to because we had a great night. We won the debate,ā€ he told Fox & Friends.

  • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    What would you consider to be an unbiased, credible source of factual information?

    Oh geezā€¦ I donā€™t think they make those anymoreā€¦ the best we can do is try to recognize the bias when we see it.

    I did find a cool app recently, though. Itā€™s called ā€œground newsā€. It attempts to show bias of news articles. Being left, right, or center. It is very useful, I would recommend it.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      I did find a cool app recently, though. Itā€™s called ā€œground newsā€. It attempts to show bias of news articles. Being left, right, or center. It is very useful, I would recommend it.

      I did find this on ground news:

      Articles that Harris wasnā€™t compelling have a strong right bias, are you taking that into account?

      Also, articles about Trump losing have a much stronger Central bias. I wonder what we can conclude from thisā€¦

      • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        Well, everyone can and should come to their own conclusion. One thingā€¦

        articles about Trump losing have a much stronger Central bias.

        Itā€™s about 1/3 central 2/3 left. I think that is a good way to look at that.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          2 months ago

          The ā€œit was about equalā€ has a higher right bias than the ā€œTrump losingā€ has a left bias.