• fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Especially since, to calculate current location, it needs an input of initial location (i.e. it needs GPS coordinates to begin with so it can track direction and velocity relative to that initial position). You can’t replace something you depend upon.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      the initial location doesn’t need to be GPS, just a known anchor location. Which is trivial to implement in the case of trains, since stations don’t move that drastically.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        But wouldn’t you scramble the precision with that? Stations can be quite big and anchoring to the station location means you already start with an offset to your location.

        Depending on the accuracy over time, they could pinpoint a location while the user is sleeping and than use that as an anchor for the day.

        But everything about that is speculative; let’s see where this goes first.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          you’re thinking anywhere on the platform, I’m suggesting a known place near a station by which the train passes and its location - at that moment - is known.

          All the system needs is a ground-truth location after a certain amount of time. GPS is just a cheap and convenient way to do it almost anywhere, but this location correction doesn’t need to be satellite-based at all.