• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Eh, I think you can illustrate your point a bit better, comrade. The map goes from good agitprop to bad when it is counterable by liberals and leftists alike. I agree with your general point on this post, so I don’t think it’s bad, but it could be better. Just my opinion.

      • Vampire [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The top one is taken from a website called vividmaps where it’s countries the USA has had some sort of conflict with

        List of wars being involved in is not a list of countries being invaded and occupied, nice try though.

        The bottom map is just a white map.

        Garbage meme 1/5

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yep, it’s pretty bad for agitprop, even if I agree that the PRC has had really peaceful development all things considered, and the US is a genocidal empire, this map gets in the way of that messaging.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s fair, I like the concept of the map hence why I shared it, but I agree it would be better if it was more accurate. Perhaps worth making a better one.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      the map is far more accurate than it is not though

      Come on, Yog, we can hold ourselves to a higher standard than this. It’d be so easy to just color in Vietnam and then you’d be set, but by posting it in its current form you are actively lying.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think there’s a difference between invasion/occupation and a minor border skirmish. Like yeah it could’ve been more accurate, but it does get the point across. 🤷

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If I was just complaining about border skirmishes, then I’d mention India or something. The attack on Vietnam was more than just a “minor border skirmish”.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well, feel free to explain how the attack on Vietnam constitutes an occupation. Are you suggesting China’s military action was carried out with the intent of annexing a part of Vietnam?

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                You still haven’t answered what you think the intent of the military action was. Do you claim any military confrontation is occupation?

                • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’d more say that the military occupation was done for the sake of confrontation (this is similar to the official Chinese line). It was a really senseless invasion, as far as I can tell (and I disagree with the Vietnamese line that the war was expansionist).