fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agoWhat if?mander.xyzimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1245arrow-down149
arrow-up1196arrow-down1imageWhat if?mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareBjörn Tantau@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up105·1 day agoBasically all atomic models that would lead you to that conclusion are wrong.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-22 hours agoI don’t think you understand their point. They’re saying that what if we exist at the scale of storms to us as some incomprehensibly larger beings’ universe.
minus-squarethe_beber@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37arrow-down4·1 day agoModels in general are wrong.
minus-squareStaticFalconar@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours agoIncluding the one where the solar system is one big atom.
Basically all atomic models that would lead you to that conclusion are wrong.
I don’t think you understand their point. They’re saying that what if we exist at the scale of storms to us as some incomprehensibly larger beings’ universe.
Models in general are wrong.
Including the one where the solar system is one big atom.
What’s this from?
Zoolander
But some are useful