Bodily autonomy is so important and the right to end your life is important. Palliative care and hospice care are fantastic for those who need it, but once all those options have been exhausted and progress can’t be made on a cure or at least quality of life improvements, you reach a point where giving the patient the tools to take their life makes ethical sense.
To me, it’s unethical.
To me it’s unethical to let someone suffer until they finally pass.
That’s a false dichotomy.
The principle of double effect allows one to attempt to relieve suffering with treatments having high mortality rates.
Euthanasia is a cost-saving measure to avoid the high costs of palliative care for non-palliative patients, and in the examples cited in the article – healthcare in general.
As a disabled person who does not make enough money to exist, this is how I see it for social programs as well. Keep the sick and injured in a constant state of anxiety and neediness until they finally break and ask for maid. It’s easier to get maid than it is to be respected as a human being.
That being said, also as a sick/ disabled person I am glad maid does exist.
