Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    I do like it also, but notice how they try to hide most of these strange effects in their demo video. Theyā€™re trying to pass it off as a playable minecraft. Anything interesting about the technology is a defect to these people.

    They also claim this is ā€œthe first playable AI-generated gameā€ when the exact same sort of thing already existed in 2022 (and it looked a lot more efficient and haunted): https://madebyoll.in/posts/game_emulation_via_dnn/ Maybe it doesnā€™t count if you call it ā€œNeural networkā€ instead of ā€œAIā€.

    • JFranek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      That article gave me a whiplash. First part: pretty cool. Second part: deeply questionable.

      For example these two paragraphs from sections ā€˜problem with codeā€™ and ā€˜magic of dataā€™:

      ā€œModular and interpretable codeā€ sounds great until you are staring at 100 modules with 100,000 lines of code each and someone is asking you to interpret it.

      Regardless of how complicated your programā€™s behavior is, if you write it as a neural network, the program remains interpretable. To know what your neural network actually does, just read the dataset

      Well, ā€œjust read the dataset broā€ sound great sounds great until you are staring at a dataset with 100 000 examples and someone is asking you to interpret it.

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        What the hell is this even arguing for? Is one module with ten million lines somehow better than 100 modules Ć  100k lines?

    • ebu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      yeah, that ā€œmost of the internet will be Al-generatedā€ nonsense is tanking my ability to take them as domain experts seriously.

      still, something gets me about completely generated, transient-when-youā€™re-not-looking, constantly shifting worlds. might have to collect more examples

      • Evinceo@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        still, something gets me about completely generated, transient-when-youā€™re-not-looking, constantly shifting worlds. might have to collect more examples

        Itā€™s dream logic.