Probably a very polarizing question.

On the one hand, having most of the users and communities on LW causes technical issues (see this post), and also gives the LW staff too much power over Lemmy as a whole.

On the other hand, with 18k MAU on LW out of 47k (https://fedidb.org/software/lemmy/), every community listed there has a much higher chance of visibility compared to an alternative hosted on another instance

History of LW controversial decisions

  • Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hello,

    Thank you for your comment.

    I agree with the fact that a story of post should only exist once, as you said. I guess the remaining question is what to do where there are two communities for the same topic.

    I have a good example that I just stumbled upon: !map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz is the most active community about maps, has usually one post per day every day for the last few months. Once in a while, someone posts on !mapporn@lemmy.world, and they instantly get a lot more comments than the first community.

    !games@sh.itjust.works is also quite active, despite not being on LW.

    Should we just give up with federation, and just aggregate all communities on LW?

    • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Should we just give up with federation, and just aggregate all communities on LW?

      No. Half the point of federation is that not only communities (instances) can carry their own content but also their own culture. Posting or commenting about a soccer personality in, say, !spain@soccer.xyz is vastly different from doing it in, say, !soccerdrugs@news.world, even if the originating link to the discussion is the same.