The Beltway pressā€™ longing for a stern-but-loving Republican daddy, who will bring our naughty nation in line, has always had an erotic tinge to it. In a widely shared Atlantic piece, drawn from his upcoming biography of Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, McKay Coppins allowed the subtext to edge alarmingly close to the text. ā€œ[O]ne canā€™t help but become a little suspicious of his handsomeness,ā€ Coppins gushes. ā€œThe jowl-free jawline. The all-seasons tan. The just-so gray at the temples of that thick black coif.ā€

It seems Georgia politician Stacey Abrams isnā€™t the only one moonlighting as a steamy romance author. I rolled my eyes throughout Coppinsā€™ piece, except for the parts where Romney dropped the daddy act to share bitchy gossip about his fellow senators. But, as far as mainstream pundits are concerned, Romney can totally get it. Coppinsā€™ article was released simultaneously with Romneyā€™s announcement that heā€™s retiring from the Senate, and the reception Romney got was fawning.

ā€œRomney bows out, leaving a legacy that would make his father proud,ā€ read the Washington Post headline of a Karen Tumulty column. She went so far as to credit Romney with ā€œpaving the way for national health-care reform,ā€ ignoring the fact that Romney ran for president in 2012 on a promise to repeal Obamacare. Tumultyā€™s take was typical, as the press drowned Romney in words like ā€œnoble,ā€ ā€œprincipled,ā€ and ā€œcourageous.ā€ The hosannas on the ā€œliberalā€ MSNBC grew to deafening levels.

All of this adulation is due mainly to the fact that Romney is the rare Republican holding elected office who is willing to state the obvious: That Donald Trump is a monster and a criminal who has no business in elected office.

But the problem with all of this Romney love is not that I personally feel sexually harassed by it. Itā€™s that it fails to account for how Romney and other ā€œtraditionalā€ Republicans are responsible for the rise of Trump and the MAGA movement. And not just because Romney and his ilk were only too happy to play along with Trump, even as he was pushing the racist ā€œbirtherā€ conspiracy theory during the 2012 election cycle. Itā€™s because they spent decades married to policy views that range from wildly unpopular to bat guano terrible, making it easy for a demagogue to come in with a platform of ā€œwho cares about policy, letā€™s just be super-racist.ā€

Romney obviously disagrees, praising himself for supposedly being the sober-minded policy guy:

But he wonā€™t acknowledge that the rampant policy failures of Republicans are why the party has no path forward, except to become a fascist cult focused on settling imaginary scores. So letā€™s review some of the greatest hits of the pre-Trump era of traditional Republican ā€œideas.ā€

All this adulation is due mainly to the fact that Romney is the rare Republican holding elected office who is willing to state the obvious: That Donald Trump is a monster and a criminal who has no business in elected office.

Cutting taxes for the rich: This has been the number one Republican priority for decades, even though the first George Bush admitted it was ā€œvoodoo economics.ā€ After decades of rising income inequality, no one believes the money will ā€œtrickle downā€ to everyone else. It has no real support outside of the wealthy people who benefit. Eight in 10 Americans disapprove of this policy. Even 43% of Republican voters donā€™t like it.

ā€œFamily values.ā€ Itā€™s not just that most Americans now support abortion rights and same-sex marriage. People are souring on the religious right and even abandoning religion altogether in record numbers.

Invading Iraq: I wonā€™t belabor how terrible this was. I will just remind readers that it was the signature ā€œachievementā€ of the last Republican president before Trump.

Health care: As far as I can tell, the GOP view of health care policy amounts to, ā€œHave you considered just dying?ā€ As with many issues, their own voters reject the partyā€™s views, and will routinely vote to give themselves Medicaid even as party leaders try to stop them.

Climate change denialism. Not talked about much in the press, but thereā€™s good reason to believe that decades of flat-out denying basic scientific facts did serious damage to the GOP in the eyes of younger voters. Trump may be a gold medal-level Olympian in the sport of lying, but he is building on a legacy of Republicans who would lie about the existence of gravity, if it pleases their corporate masters.

One could go on forever, but the bigger picture is this: On policy, Republicans simply have nothing to offer. They wonā€™t improve peopleā€™s lives or fix existing problems. They only survived as long as they did because of gerrymandering and a tilted electoral map, backed by an unbelievable amount of money spent on right-wing propaganda like Fox News.

Trump understands the power of cynicism in politics all too well, and so was able to exploit this situation. He just sidestepped the policy issue altogether and instead offered something different: Naked hatred. Bigotry. Exciting conspiracy theories. And, crucially, a desire to destroy democracy altogether. After all, debating policy only matters if youā€™re trying to persuade people. If your goal is to crush them under your boot, there is no need to worry overmuch if they like your policies or not.

Again, Trump wouldnā€™t have gone this far without traditional Republicans like Romney laying the groundwork for decades. Republicans have long known that their policy views are unpopular and wonā€™t win them elections, and so theyā€™ve increasingly looked for ways to get power through cheating. Mainly, that was by passing laws that restricted voting access for people of color and young people, who tend to lean more Democratic. Romney is one of the guilty parties in this, even going so far as to compare President Joe Bidenā€™s efforts to protect voting rights with Trumpā€™s lies about the 2020 election.

Romney whined that voting rights advocates accuse their opponents of having ā€œracist inclinations.ā€ But what matters here is not what is in anyoneā€™s heart. Itā€™s totally possible, likely even, that many Republicans back voter suppression not because they hate Black people, but because they hate losing elections. But the effect of these laws and this rhetoric is the same: It implanted and reinforced the idea, with Republican voters, that there is something tawdry and illegitimate about Black people voting. Trump exploited that sensibility with his Big Lie, which rested on accusations that votes from racially diverse cities are necessarily ā€œfrauds.ā€

There were many opportunities over the years for Republicans to forge another path. They could have moderated their views on social issues. They could have gone the route of Richard Nixon, conceding that environmental concerns should trump a mindless anti-regulatory stance. They could have raised taxes on the rich with the pro-capitalist argument that it increases business investment. Considering that they still got nearly half of the votes with their unpopular policies, they really didnā€™t have to change much at all to be successful. Just be slightly less terrible on some issue, any issue.

But they didnā€™t do that and increasingly had nothing positive to offer to voters. That opened the door for an authoritarian demagogue, who built his power not on policy ideas, but on a promise he would hurt all the folks that conservative white people donā€™t like. Romney doesnā€™t deserve an ounce of credit. He may be unhappy with what his own failure of imagination helped usher in, but ultimately, this is still largely the fault of him and other ā€œtraditionalā€ Republicans.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    If active Republican politicians acted exactly like retired republican politicians (instead of just having a retirement-triggered rhetoric update right after they stop being able to actively influence anything), not only would I be able to tolerate that a lot better than what the party is today, but also our government would probably get a whole fucking lot more done.

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      also our government would probably get a whole fucking lot more done.

      Thatā€™s not on their agenda. They donā€™t want the government getting anything done. That would restore faith in the institution, and they donā€™t want that. Theyā€™ve spent too much time and energy trying to tear it down.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Well what I mean is that after retiring, they seem to suddenly give a whole lot more fucks about things they were actively trying to ruin in the decades leading up to their retirements.