Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agoEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1722arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1715arrow-down1imageEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksJoker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square56fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoIf they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoIt makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agoThe point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days agodude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
If they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
It makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
The point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
dude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao