I said something along the lines of:

“Wow, I haven’t had a reason to smile ear to ear in a while.”

Along with

“Nah, the more dead corpos dragons, the better.”

In response to some liberal going off about how violence is never the solution, not mentioning how this murdered dipshit has personally overseen a system that perpetuates harm, suffering and death (violence) in the name of profit.

Good ole’ civility clause.

Whats the paradox of tolerance?

.world mods have never heard of it I guess.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    We do not tolerate threats of and calls for violence in any form against any living creature.

    So lemmy.world forbids discussion about hunting?

    About fishing?

    About organized industrial agriculture?

    About austerity measures?

    About prison systems?

    About police?

    I’ll give you that my comment about hoping more corpos die actually breaks those rules, but uh, I’m using lemmy on mobile, through an app.

    It would be helpful to list this rule in the instance sidebar that mobile users can actually see.

    But anyway, this says nothing about celebrating or joking about a violence that has already happened.

    Celebration and jokes, on their own, are not threats nor calls for violence.

    If you wanna say that you’re not allowed to celebrate or joke about violence that happened to a person or thing, without threatening or calling for further violence (like my smiling comment, and many other recently deleted for tos comments) it would probably be a good idea to actually have a rule for that.

    … Also, can you harass or perpetuate violence against a dead person?

    … Is it considered violence if you mock a dead person? Harassment?

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yeah, that’s some lib shit if I’ve ever seen it. There’s no reason to write the rules so narrowly, but if you do and you coincidentally only enforce it against people threatening power, you deserve the vegan police in your reports constantly.