Archived version

The group’s president, Kevin D. Roberts, made the comments in an interview on “The War Room,” the Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon’s show on the network Real America’s Voice.

Mr. Roberts was discussing the Supreme Court’s ruling on Monday that presidents have substantial immunity from prosecution for what they do in office, a ruling that upended the criminal case against former President Donald J. Trump for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election and that removes a potential barrier to the most radical elements of his second-term agenda if he is elected again.

“We ought to be really encouraged by what happened yesterday, and in spite of all of the injustice — which of course friends and audience of this show, of our friend Steve, know — we are going to prevail,” Mr. Roberts said, alluding to Mr. Bannon’s imprisonment.

He went on to say that “the radical left” was “apoplectic” because “our side is winning” and said, “And so I come full circle in this response and just want to encourage you with some substance that we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is a seditious threat that justifies preemptively striking in self-defense.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a cold calculus but letting them kill someone first means the army has the moral and narrative high ground when the Army Rangers black bag these guys at 3 in the morning.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes I agree. Actions should always weigh more than words. We need them to put those words into action before it’s justified to act back.

        So maybe we should be like: “bring it on”? Idk that’s probably not a good idea either.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          We’re fast approaching the point at which there are no more bad ideas. But yeah for now, it’s best to try and prevent any major incident while not letting the authoritarians win. Countries do not come out the same way when either of those things happens. And the chance that it’s a change for the better is remote.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        When it starts, they’re the ones who will be giving the Army Rangers the orders.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Eh, not exactly. That would be telegraphed literal years in advance as they would have to entirely rebuild the officer corps to be loyalists to them specifically. Right now the military leadership puts a lot of stock in the Constitution, so much so that the last time Trump tried to order them to go after BLM protestors, they not only refused the order, they then sent a memo to the entire force reminding them of the exact wording of their oath.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            You’ve heard of Project 2025, right? Rebuilding the officer corps (and the entire rest of the government) to be loyalists is exactly what they’re planning to do.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Okay, and I’m telling you that’s not something you can do quickly. There’s a reason new dictators usually stand up a separate force.